an abstract or summary especially of a literary work lt an argument preceded the poem gt 5. one of the independent variables upon whose value that of a function depends b. a substantive as the direct object of a transitive verb that is required by a predicate in grammar c. amplitude 4 sample professional, not academic argument: for a definitional essay, you need to write an argument that a borderline or contested case fits or does not fit within a particular category by classifying that particular case and defining the category. definitional arguments require a definition of key terms: example: joe is too bossy. Define bossy and provide examples of his bossy attitude poor listening skills, shouting at people, making decisions without asking committee these are what define bossy in your argument.

The criteria section of your argument explains and illustrates your criteria. The match section of your argument persuades the reader that your example meets those criteria. example: although the hercules shoe company is nonpolluting and provides a socially useful product, claim it is not a socially responsible company because clause because it treats its workers unjustly. criteria part: what points must be met for a company to be deemed socially responsible ? 1 research how others have defined your term dictionaries, judicial opinions, expert testimony, etc. In what ways does the shoe company meet those points? 1 supply examples of how this and other situations meet your criteria.

topic is a question about a definition of a term or its category the question must be arguable avoid poor topics: topics that are too extensive or aren't arguable i.

Questions that can be answered by looking at a dictionary or other reference make poor topics. Papers about the definition of love or friendship tend to be weak because people are used to thinking of their characteristics a matter of personal rather than public preference. Abortion is murder is a definition argument, but you can't address the definition of life and the definition of murder in the page length you have available to you. Stick with arguments that people are likely to disagree about or have never thought of but still can be persuaded by. Whether the category is good or bad can be what's at stake, but it shouldn’t be the only argument. Example: sweatshop labor is bad is a poor topic, but sweatshop labor is slavery is a good topic choice. People already feel that is bad, so if you can convince people that sweatshop labor is slavery, you've won your definition argument and people will hopefully disapprove of sweatshop labor as they disapprove of slavery.

A short story, or a novel that usually appears as an introduction or a point on which the writer will develop his work in order to convince his readers. Therefore, an argument does not intend to serve only as an introduction but it attracts the reader’s focus to an issue that will be made clear gradually. In our everyday life, we use different arguments in our discussions to convince others to accept our viewpoint. We believe and state what is true and then we gradually build an argument around it to make others believe that what we think is relevant and true.

Then, we support it with logical reasons such as it is a source of information, and it is a hub of entertainment, and so on. The word argument can be used to designate a dispute or a fight, or it can be used more technically. The focus of this article is on understanding an argument as a collection of truth bearers that is, the things that bear truth and falsity, or are true and false some of which are offered as reasons for one of them, the conclusion. This article takes propositions rather than sentences or statements or utterances to be the primary truth bearers. The reasons offered within the argument are called premises , and the proposition that the premises are offered for is called the conclusion. This sense of argument diverges not only from the above sense of a dispute or fight but also from the formal logician’s sense according to which an argument is merely a list of statements, one of which is designated as the conclusion and the rest of which are designated as premises regardless of whether the premises are offered as reasons for believing the conclusion. Arguments, as understood in this article, are the subject of study in critical thinking and informal logic courses in which students usually learn, among other things, how to identify, reconstruct, and evaluate arguments given outside the classroom.

Arguments, in this sense, are typically distinguished from both implications and inferences. In asserting that a proposition p implies proposition q, one does not thereby offer p as a reason for q. The proposition frogs are mammals implies that frogs are not reptiles. If an arguer offers an argument in order to persuade an audience that the conclusion is true, then it is plausible to think that the arguer is inviting the audience to make an inference from the argument’s premises to its conclusion.

Essay on Effects of Technology on Human Life

However, an inference is a form of reasoning, and as such it is distinct from an argument in the sense of a collection of propositions some of which are offered as reasons for the conclusion. One might plausibly think that a person s infers q from p just in case s comes to believe q because s believes that p is true and because s believes that the truth of p justifies belief that q. But this movement of mind from p to q is something different from the argument composed of just p and q. The characterization of argument in the first paragraph requires development since there are forms of reasoning such as explanations which are not typically regarded as arguments even though explanatory reasons are offered for a proposition.

Two principal approaches to fine tuning this first step characterization of arguments are what may be called the structural and pragmatic approaches. The pragmatic approach is motivated by the view that the nature of an argument cannot be completely captured in terms of its structure. In what follows, each approach is described, and criticism is briefly entertained. along the way, distinctive features of arguments are highlighted that seemingly must be accounted for by any plausible characterization.