author s: publication information: date, volume and issue, page numbers publisher information: publisher organization, e.g. keywords: these should be keywords that define the major topics of the article. If someone were searching a database of these articles, then they would search these keywords much as you searched eric databases. reviewer: this is the person in your group writing this article review! introduction: very short intro to the article one or two sentence summary at most. Why did you and your group decide to look at this article and review it for your current project.

What are the most important conclusions of the article or the most important aspects from your perspective? how, specifically, does this inform your group and your project? what did you learn from the article? are there points in the article with which you agree or disagree? why? pull it all together what conclusions or implications do you feel are the most important? again, don't feel that you need to write a long document. A few well crafted paragraphs that are succinct and directly to the point with sound arguments supporting your position are all that are needed. note: if you prefer to combine your analysis with the overview, this decision is fine. Still provide the abstract section and just make it exactly that, an abstract that is one paragraph and no more than 150 words. Then, i will expect to see a more detailed summary of the article woven into the analysis and synthesis section.

A-Level Essays for History

Delete this paragraph when you actually edit this page for your article review. instructions for summary of journal article notice: journal article summaries must not be plagiarized. Plagiarism which includes copying material from another student or directly from a book, article, or online source is a form of cheating. If a student is suspected of plagiarism, the psychology research administrator will inform the course instructor and investigate the matter.

If it is established that the student plagiarized, a penalty will be assessed according to university policy. materials: the student must select an article from one of the scholarly journals in psychology listed below. The article should contain all the information necessary for a reader to replicate the research e.g.

How many participants were used, the materials or apparatus used, the statistical analysis so that the reader can judge the study’s scientific merit. Review articles in which the author s summarizes past research, but does not present an original research study are not acceptable. Students must not use information from popular press books or magazines no psychology today articles. In addition, some of the journals are available online through the cook library website. Go to the reference desk on the second floor of the library if you need help finding an article. Adolescence, american journal of family therapy, basic and applied social psychology, british journal of social psychology, clinical psychology: science and practice, developmental psychology, exceptional children, journal of applied social psychology, psychology and aging, school psychology review, school psychology quarterly. writing the summary: all summaries must be typed, be in prose not outline form , and conform to proper grammar.

Divisional Judging for Transcontinental Railroad Essay

the student must include a photocopy or printout of the complete original journal article. deadline: article summaries must be handed in by the last day of classes. In order to submit a manuscript for consideration of publication in the journal, read this document first and then follow the instructions closely ! you must include this cover page with all submissions. 1. you must register with the journal as a user before you can submit an article! see the link how to submit an article.

2. log in to fastrack the ijoi online electronic submission process 3. complete the submission cover page form see template below. save the file on your computer. 4. prepare one msword.doc file containing the submission cover sheet, followed by your manuscript. If you have any questions, please email the editor for more assistance at: cloaking instructions: all submissions must include the submission cover page given below. We even changed the goddamned running head! hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even your bloodthirsty reviewers. I shall skip the usual point by point description of every single change we made in response to the critiques. After all, it is fairly clear that your reviewers are less interested in details of scientific procedure than in working out their personality problems and sexual frustrations by seeking some sort of demented glee in the sadistic and arbitrary exercise of tyrannical power over hapless authors like ourselves who happen to fall into their clutches.

We do understand that, in view of the misanthropic psychopaths you have on your editorial board, you need to keep sending them papers, for if they weren't reviewing manuscripts they'd probably be out mugging old ladies or clubbing baby seals to death. Still, from this batch of reviewers, c was clearly the most hostile, and we request that you not ask her or him to review this revision. Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer c, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed. For example, if as reviewer c suggested , several of my ancestry were indeed drawn from other species, it is too late to change that.