Unit 3 – nature versus nurture it has long been known that certain physical characteristics are biologically determined by genetic inheritance. Colour of eyes, straight or curly hair, pigmentation of the skin and certain diseases are all a function of the genes we inherit. Other physical characteristics, if not determined, appear to be at least strongly influenced by the genetic make up of our biological parents.

Other than physical characteristics, many people believe than how we grow and develop is down to what we inherit from our parents, but this is disputed by other people who believe that the way children develop is in fact down to the environment in which they live. Nature versus nurture simply is the theory of how children’s growth, development and learning are influenced by either: nature the effect of inherited factors/genes since the dawn of modern psychology, the nature versus nurture issue the controversy over the relative contributions of biology and experience , has been deliberated and debated a great deal by psychologists biological and behavioral , geneticists, and philosophers alike. I challenge those in the field of psychotherapy that believe that the nature of depression as a disease and affliction is rooted in only biology, chemistry, or behavioral or environmental conditioning. Hebb, who combined years of research in brain surgery and human behavior and is known as the father of neuropsychol.

Arguments for the nature aspect of the debate have been built on the concepts of inborn biases, behavior genetics and maturation. Arguments for the nurture side of the debate come in the form of the internal model of experience, the ecological perspective and cultural influence. Nurture one of the big debates that is in our society now is the nature versus nurture controversy. Some people believe that it is hard to change the nature genetics rather than the enviromental genetics. Nature which is genetics combined with nurture which is enviromental create who we are today. The nature versus nurture debate deals with children developing their psychological attributes through genetics, in this case nature, or through their education and how they are raised, also known as nurture. Considering philosophy as a whole, it is possible to distinguish philosophers who adopt an extreme nature or heredity position, known as nativists, and philosophers who support the nurture and environmental position, known as empiricists.

On the other hand, with an opposite opinion regarding the nature nurture topic we can find th. Nurture from anti essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples. Nurture argument? nature, defined refers to the genes that people inherit, as in, the color of our eyes, the shape of our faces, and the coarseness of our hair. Nurture, defined refers to all the environmental influences, beginning with the mother’s health and diet during prenatal development and continuing lifelong, including the individual experiences with family, school, community, and society berger, k.

Humorous Narrative Essay

From birth, nature, we have automatic instincts to survive as we develop we form our personality from our surroundings and environment. Nature and nurture come together and form the person as a whole that we become as we grow from an infant into an adult. To me it seems evident how the tow should coincide together instead of fighting against one another, as man this is our natural tendency to do. Man kinds tendency is to believe only what can be seen and proven under a microscope, and denies what he cannot.

Both sides, nature and nurture, have been explored thoroughly and tremendous evidence have been found in favor of them both nature vs. By: tommy bull 830 words bull may 22, 2010 bull 526 views through time, psychologists have argued over whether only our genes control our behaviors in life or if the environment and the people surrounding us have any effect in our lives. One question is, if genes control our behavior, are we really responsible for our actions? i think that if we can make choices we are responsible for our actions. While or genes influence various aspects of our personalities, there is no denying that our environment has some effects too. Our genes make us, but our experiences and our surroundings shape the way we behave as people. The people we grow up with, especially our parents teach us ways of acting and thinking that we keep for the rest of our lives. Another question is, if an individual does not have the bad gene, but they commit a crime, are they more responsible.

Dissertation Verlag Internet

To look at this issue from another perspective, judges determine responsibility for actions by something called blameworthiness. If a person does not know what they are doing, such as a mentally ill person who commits a crime, or they are not aware of the consequences, such as a child who plays with a parent’s gun, then they cannot be legally held responsible. Blameworthiness makes no mention of genes, so if you had the bad gene and you committed a crime that you were fully aware of doing and you knew the consequences if you got caught, you would be fully responsible for your actions. From my standpoint, all healthy individuals are responsible the nature versus nurture debate concerns the relative importance of an individual’s innate qualities versus personal experiences in determining or causing differences in physical and behavioral traits. Almost everyone in any related field has an opinion as to which is truly more important, nature or nurture. The director of a group called the minnesota study of twins reared apart, thomas bouchard, believes that 70 percent of a person’s personality is genetic and 30 percent is due to environment.

The director of the lewisville twin study, adam matheny, however, says it is 50 50. A lot of physical development is pre programmed to coincide with brain development and is brought about through nature. Even the cases of identical twins are not a perfect example of nature being superior to nurture. If some of the ties happen to be a coincidence and some happen to be based on vague knowledge of their past, the entire idea is less credible. For example, the fact that the jim twins both named their sons james allen or james alan could be simply naming the child after themselves.

Divine Comedy Essay

Allen/alan might be because they were told that their birth father was named alan. The only way to know for sure is to know more about the context of all the things that are similar between the two. Based on all this information, i believe nurture is more important than nature, at a balance of 70 percent of early childhood development being influenced by a person’s environment and 30 percent being influenced by genetics.