Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our towns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. In the 1970s the world will undergo famines hundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.

what's the unfpa? how do they profit from fear?

the united nations fund for population activities unfpa was founded in 1969, the year after ehrlich published the population bomb. They have been involved in programs with governments around the world who deny their women the right to choose the number and spacing of their children. Their complicit work with the infamous one child policy mandated by the government of the people's republic of china, uncovered by an investigation of the u.s.

How Long Does a College Research Paper Have to Be

The wealthy of the west, in their terror of poverty, have given copiously to the unfpa and its population control programs. Population database, the world's population in 2010 will be 6,908,688,0. the landmass of texas is 268,820 sq mi 7,494,271,488,0 sq ft. so, divide 7,494,271,488,0 sq ft by 6,908,688,0 people. And you get 1084.76 sq ft/person. that's approximately a 33' x 33' plot of land for every person on the planet, enough space for a town house. Given an average four person family, every family would have a 66' x 66' plot of land, which would comfortably provide a single family home and yard and all of them fit on a landmass the size of texas. Admittedly, it'd basically be one massive subdivision, but texas is a tiny portion of the inhabitable earth. Such an arrangement would leave the entire rest of the world vacant. While they provide low, medium, and high variants, the low variant is the one that keeps coming true, so the low variant numbers are the ones used in this video.

Before starting this article, i wish to specify that it is not because i choose to question the concept of overpopulation that i also question the need to end poverty, overconsumption and environmental destruction. Overpopulation may be debatavle, but poverty and unsustainable practices are a reality and my life is geared towards raising consciousness about alternative ways to operate as a society. However, i believe it is important to question everything even claims closely tied to the activist and environmentalist movement.

Why? because by questioning theories such as overpopulation, i discovered an even more promising future than the never ending struggle of trying to merely control the damage we cause to the planet and each other without addressing the cause. questioning scare tactics, even if they seem to be geared towards noble causes, does not necessarily deny our support of the causes themselves. Yet they might save us from getting caught up on issues that distract us from the real problems and relevant steps we can take to create meaningful and long lasting change. The concept of overpopulation originated in england in 1798, when the reverend thomas robert malthus saw that food production increased incrementally, while people reproduced exponentially. Based on his calculations, he predicted that the world would be out of food by the year 1980. V read it online . not only that, he believed certain diseases should not sought to be cured for the sake of population control.

but above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases and those benevolent, but much mistaken men, who have thought they were doing a service to mankind by projecting schemes for the total extirpation of particular disorders. as harsh as this sounds, the push for depopulation was defined by those supporting it as a necessary evil to save humanity and the planet. In 1968, paul ehrlich of stanford university adopted and propagated malthus’ theory of overpopulation. He claimed that excessive human reproduction has overwhelmed the planet and predicted that the world would undergo massive famines, which would kill off hundreds of millions of people by the end of the 70’s. In the 1970s the world will undergo famineshundreds of millions of people will starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. because of the fear that such an alarming claim triggered, large sums of money were donated to the unfpa the united nations population fund , which was founded the year after ehrlich published the population bomb. This fund thrives on a crisis that – despite being imminent – keeps on being rescheduled over and over again for the past 200 years.

Probable Essays for Cpf Exam

How imminent is this crisis exactly? is there really too little space, too little resources and too many people? what are the facts and what are the myths?

1. The entire world population can sink into the state of texas

many believe that overpopulation is a question of lack of space. If we divide 7,494,271,488,0 square feet by 7,268,730,0 people, we get 1031 square feet per person.

This is enough space for everyone on earth to live in a townhouse while altogether fitting on a landmass the size of texas. And we’re not even accounting for the average four person family who would most likely share a home! it is not to say that creating such a massive subdivision would be a smart, sustainable or practical thing to do. Cramming together a population that continues to over consume, waste and poison the environment the way we currently do would be a recipe for disaster.

Notice how small texas is compared to the rest of the world!

did you know?

every man, woman, and child on earth could each have 5 acres of land. Calculated from numbers found on: central intelligence agency the world factbook if we wanted to squeeze close, everyone in the world could stand shoulder to shoulder on the island of zanzibar. Cities are overcrowded, the world is not how can this be proved? easy: conditions of apparent overpopulation only exist in cities, not in rural areas.

Essay About Forgiveness

The reason is because there are more opportunities to make money in the city than in the countryside. a city is crowded because people come from miles and miles away to move there, not because of wreck less reproduction and overpopulation.

did you know?

studies show that birthrates are lower in urban areas than in rural areas. source

1. Scarcity is a myth

the world is abundant of resources and could provide for everyones need. Meanwhile, the poor still starve to death not because resources are scarce, but because they dont have the money or have rights to enough land.

did you know?

all the worlds nearly one billion hungry people could be lifted out of malnourishment on less than a quarter of the food that is wasted in the us, uk and europe. Click here for more outrageous food waste facts abundance, not scarcity, best describes the worlds current food supply. Enough grains are produced to provide every human being with 3,500 calories per day – 1,500 more calories per day than recommended by the food and drug administration.

Both of the worlds leading authorities on food distribution the united nations food and agriculture organization fao and the world food programme wfp stated that there is more than enough food for everyone on the planet. Think about it: the earth does not concentrate its abundance wherever there is gold or stop seeds from sprouting if they were not owned or paid for. A whole empire designed for the richest to exclusively hoard most of the earth’s resources is nothing more than a game of monopoly covering the fact that our planet provides more than enough resources for all of its inhabitants to share equally. earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s need, but not every man’s greed. Overpopulation does not cause hunger, unfair management does sociologists frederick buttel and laura raynolds published a study of population growth, food consumption, and other variables in ninety three third world countries.

However, they did find that the populations of poorer countries, and those countries where the poorest 20 % of the population earned a smaller percentage of a nations total income. In other words, poverty and inequality cause hunger, not overpopulation. The theory of overpopulation describes a situation where the number of people exhausts the resources in a closed environment such that it can no longer support that population. A good analogy would be to compare our planet to a barricaded house, with no way to neither enter nor exit.