students will compare similarities and differences and contrast only differences key themes and issues in two cultures within one chronological period. It will focus on at least two different societies or civilizations, which are probably interacting with each other in some manner or method. Traditionally, students are much more comfortable with this type of essay, and it is easiest to begin with this type first.

They may choose between two or three sub themes or regions, but all students will write the same essays on relatively the same topic. one possible prompt would be: compare and contrast one west european and one african state during the post classical era. Two states would be france and mali. again all essays must have an acceptable thesis, which address the issues and themes specified in the prompt. It is best in the thesis paragraph or thesis statement to make a significant and direct comparison. It is not acceptable to simply say the two civilizations were similar and different – specify specifically how they are similar and different. If the prompt specifies themes to discuss, then students will also have to discuss each of the themes at least once.

Mental Health An Important Aspect of Life Essay

There is a higher and lower standard on the rubric. the body paragraphs which follow should compare and contrast three themes or groups. Create paragraphs using themes from the college board course guide see scripted or persian and within each compare and contrast mali and france. For instance, while mali and france both had monarchical forms of government, their religions – mali was muslim and france was roman catholic – created quite different societies. This sub theme represents a more elaborated part of the thesis and will introduce the paragraph on religious differences. students must substantiate the thesis with appropriate historical evidence .

I Need An Dissertation Writier Sentence

In each paragraph, students should cite include key vocabulary, dates, historical events, persons, trends, and occurrences. The simplest formula is to have one fact per comparison category if the grouping is government, your paragraph should have at least one piece of evidence on malian and one on french government. An example is post classical french government was largely feudal with a king distributing lands to nobles in exchange for service. Nobles maintained local order and justice and were obligated to give the king 40 days of military service yearly. similarl y, mali had a king but power was held regionally by provincial elites. students must make two or more relevant, direct comparisons between or among societies . Because of this, students should organize their essays by grouping in a relevant manner.

Narrative Paper Guidelines

Within the groups, the student should compare and contrast the two civilizations. They may include whereas, on the other hand, both, etc. and students must analyze at least two reasons for a similarity or difference identified in a direct comparison. Such a sentence could be: france and mali both had decentralized political structures yet for different reasons. France had to give local nobles power in order to repel vikings and to halt invasions. Paris and the king were too distant to respond to local problems immediately and swiftly. Had power not been granted locally, france could have been destroyed in the early post classical age.

The sultan of mali conquered an enormous area and established a tributary relationship with the defeated rulers. They had to fight to prevent their subject provinces from throwing off the sultan’s rule. information on this page comes from mr. Philp john paul ii high school first, i would like to thank you for answering this. Please listen to what i have to say first, if you don 039 t mind i 039 m trying to be as humble as possible, because i really need these answers: i am a freshman, and i am taking ap world history.

My teacher bases the essay on 5 criterion: evidence direct comparison analysis my first essay 039 s thesis was although mesopotamia and egypt had differences in worship and geological features, polytheism and class division made them similar. I dont know why my second essay 039 s thesis was india and china had differences in political structures and religious structures, but had similarities in social structures. How should i make it less broad? my essays grades improved from essay 1 to 2 i got a 40% on the first essay. Yay! this doesnt seem good, but everyone else basically got the same grade as me, so i 039 m aiming for improvement, although an a+ would be tearjerkingly glorious. I would start bawling on the floor i improved on my claim, but i only got half of the maximum amount of points in the evidence criteria. I did though, but i placed them in opposite sides of the paragraph one in the beginning, one at the end.

She gave me half the max points in evidence criteria, like previously stated, but zero points on direct comparison. Does direct comparison have to be next to each other? for example, if i were comparing china and india 039 s government structure, do i have to say for example, china was centralized while india was regional. If i said that, would that count for evidence and direct comparison? isnt direct comparison for evidence? arent they interdependent? what i absolutely do not understand is analysis. I thought i did wonderful sorry for the extreme emphasis but i get my essays back and they 039 re always zero points. I said verbatim, the indian classical civilization 039 s politics mostly revolved around religion.

Help With Book Report

Since hinduism 039 s tolerance influenced the indian politics, indian politics became very tolerant of diversity. In another aspect, there was no ruler that permanently unified india, unlike china 039 s shi huangdi. What am i doing wrong? if it isnt too much trouble, can you thoroughly explain my mistakes and what the correct way to write a compare and contrast essay is? like i previously said, i got a 40 and a 50. I want to pass for once! china and india were two of the greatest classical civilizations in human history. They both possessed elaborate societal levels and castes that defined the way that their citizens lived, with india having an official caste system, while china had a pecking order of lords, famer peasants, and mean people. However, india was made up of diverse and unstable empires, while china was usually unified under a single ruler in a line of kings, making it a far more powerful and politically successful nation than india. We can analyze these two civilizations using their governments, religions, and cultures.

Both china and india have dynastic like periods of government during their classical eras. China possessed four main dynasties, the shang, the zhou, the qin, and the han, while india was run by empires such as the mauryans, the guptas, and the kushans, which is most likely because both of their lines of kings was often changing due to decline in tax revenue, social divisions, internal rebellion, and invasions. However, china was intensely focused on bureaucracy while india did not develop very solid political institutions. China possessed bureaucrats and local warrior landlords during the zhou and han dynasties, and india brought forth autocratic emperors as well as aristocratic assemblies, and did not stress great importance on political values or service. This is mainly due to the importance of local units of government and the social relationships inside the indian caste system, with the religious leaders at the head of government. Furthermore, regionalism was at a high in india, while china was usually unified under one powerful emperor.

At one time, ashoka was a powerful leader in india, but china is famous for having leaders such as qin shi huangdi and wu ti. The social structures of both ancient china and ancient egypt were shaped by their philosophies and beliefs. This affected widely the gender structure of both of these civilizations, as well as the formation of their laws. While china rsquo s philosophies were forming and establishing a social structure, egypt rsquo s religion and beliefs were highly influencing them. The chinese civilization was being developed near the yangtze and the huan he rivers. This river valley civilization went through a variety of changes within different dynasties. One of those changes was their social structure, which was influenced by laws and beliefs.

However, there was political instability which lead to a period called ldquo the warring states rdquo and to a new dynasty called the zhou dynasty. Throughout this period, several philosophical schools appeared, but eventually they ended up being three: confucianism, legalism, and daoism. Out of these three, confucius founded the most influential one, which stated a meritocracy a hierarchy with scholars at the top. Its social structure was based on who had more knowledge since its principal value was that ldquo knowledge is the key to success rdquo.