Gun violence in america is a not a debate over the pro gun or anti gun culture. Rather it entails the fundamental issues of law and government and the rights of every american citizen to enjoy life and pursue happiness. The pro gun lobbyists and the national rifle association nra since its conception in 1871 have sought to manipulate and twist article ii of the bill of rights found within the united states constitution, thereby recreating the idea of manifest destiny and bringing the current topic of the right to bear arms вќ to washington. What the nra, pro gun lobbyists and many citizens fail to realize, is that unless we impose stricter gun laws, mandatory registrations and thorough background checks we will continue to see the disasters similar to those of waco, texas and columbine, colorado across our nation's headlines.

Private citizens who run amuck governing themselves as a separate and sovereign states with nothing more than a promise of good faith to govern themselves amid other citizens, tipping the scales in favor of those with the bigger stick and imposing a looming and dangerous cloud of possible anarchy which could occur at any moment. The national rifle association was conceived in 1871, since then they're mission statement has dramatically changed from the scientific study of firearms, вќ. In 1975 the national rifle association established the institute for legislative action ila set up to protect citizens rights to purchase, possess and use firearms.

Essay on Nature And Man In Hindi

The ila is also referred to as the lobbying arm of the national rifle association in washington, which many times responds to those in favor of stricter laws as over emotive individuals. As reported recently in a reuters publication, the coalition to stop gun violence, the national troopers coalition and the international brotherhood of police officers joined michael barnes, you have not saved any essays. Gun violence amongst our younger generation if you recently picked up a newspaper or turned on to see the news you may have questioned to yourself what is happening in our schools and begin to think whether our schools and neighborhoods are a safe place for our children. Our streets have become a battleground where teenage gangsters shoot it out for territorial turf to sell their drugs and innocent children are caught daily in the crossfire of drive by shootings. American's can't keep ignoring the damage that these criminals are doing to our society, and must take action to stop these horrors we are surrounded by daily. However, the effort by some misguided individuals to eliminate the legal ownership of guns does not address the real problems at hand and simply disarms the innocent law abiding citizens who are most in need of a form of self defense. They claim that gun violence in this country has gotten to a point where something must be done to stop it.

Expository Essay Body Paragraph Structure

They would like to see these criminals disarmed and they want the random violence to stop. While claiming that they want to take guns out of the hands of criminals they work to pass laws that would take the guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens instead. For this reason the effort at gun control does not address the real problem of gun crime. Even though gun control laws might help some people to feel better and safe, it will not stop the person who intends to hurt someone.

вќ i believe that it should read, only responsible adults who meet the requirements may posses guns the subject of gun control has been a key subject in many political debates, may be ever since the gun was invented. If it is used in an inappropriate way it may cause harm to both the target and the user. Over the recent pat the availability of gun high hit the roof guns being available for sale even in the supermarket. Among this individual 50 of them are usually teenager.though many attempts to control this deaths have been made most have prove to be futile. A land mark bill was passed by the congress that banned the general manufacture and importation of all semi automatic weapons and other high capacity ammunition clips.

From this ban the number of crime has decreased by about 20% comparing it to the year 1994. This ban was then repealed the bill adding a clause that the individual who is purchasing a gun to has a 5 day waiting period. One of the main objectives of these bills was to reduce the availability of the guns in the market. The only best way of eliminating gun is to make the gun illegal though making them illegal will mean that only outlaws will be the ones having the gun.

This is basically because the american black market will always have a way to supply the weapon to the individuals. The debate goes on having a pull and push effect between making the weapon available or not. As i had earlier mentioned, the congress passed a ban on the sale of semi automatic firearms and assault weapons, soon after the congress resumed it repealed the bill as a payback to the national rifle association since they funded the bill through congress as a business strategy. In a study that was carried out about 65% of the voting americans would vote for a congressman who will not vote for the repeal of the bill. This clearly shows that the common american was comfortable with the bill as it is. In 1981 the then president ronald reagan and his personal assistant fell victim to the gun violence. The individual who had had the assassinating attempt had purchased the gun no longer than two or three days before the assassination attempt.

The bill named brady bill was passed laying down a mandatory waiting period of 5 days on the purchase of any gun. The period is used to carry out a background check of the individual who is purchasing the weapon. The state has the powers to regulate the purchase and also restrict the purchase of the riffle or firearm. In one of the states the restrictions to the purchase of the riffle are as follows: the individual must be 18 year an above the person must be an american citizen the individual must not have any criminal record the individual should not have any reported case of mental illness in other states the rue my differ but the concept is generally the same in all the states. In other states these laws are different but, they are very similar the bill was signed by the then president bill clinton. Although the bill was federal a problem arises when some of the states were defiant in the reception of the bill.