The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request. Please contact the server administrator, email 160 protected and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error. Additionally, a 500 internal server error error was encountered while trying to use an errordocument to handle the request. In earlier times, a ‘common’ market was the place where both buyers and sellers would meet and conduct their transactions. It would have a variety of products ranging from spices, fruits to animals, antiques, crockery and other commodities. this common market also served as a centre of trade as people would come from various regions to display their commodities and specialities in order to gain and expand business outside their borders. With time, the concept of the common market evolved giving way to a variety of specialised markets such as antiques market, farmers’ market and other.

Supermarkets then came into existence as living standards and life styles changed. Today, in almost all countries, there are a great number of supermarkets and malls whereby a great number of products can be bought and sold. But is one of form of market better than the other? this particular comparative exercise continues to be conducted at various levels. this is primarily because as countries are integrating on various fronts through globalization, the competition between firms and markets is becoming intense.

Thus, it is utmost critical to conduct comparison exercises to be aware of advantages and disadvantages and to know where the greatest benefits to consumers lie. The preference for each depends on one’s lifestyle, convenience and routines followed. Thus, the demand for supermarket and farmer’s market solely depends on consumer needs and requirements and both will continue as long as they serve the interests of the consumers. these are just excerpts of essays please access the order form for custom essays, research papers, term papers, thesis, dissertations, book reports and case studies. you can follow any responses to this entry through the rss 2.0 both comments and pings are currently closed. travel back to a period of simplified everyday life, when candles were considered luxury items and grocery stores were nonexistent. Agrarian farmers built their entire houses without store bought materials, and survived off of only what they produced. Children were seen as workers, not as an extra expense, and played a major role in production. The question is, why would someone want to live this primitive life in an age of growing industrialization.

For the southern agrarians, farming was a spiritual practice that was seen as the only occupation that allowed people to live free. They believed that industry and trade made one dependent on a boss, and caused greedy personalties. As generally self sufficient people, small farmers had little use or interest in economic development. The ideas of factories and mass production caused national excitement that turned agrarian ideals into a minority belief. The struggle to maintain traditional values and expose industry as a form of evil is expressed by andrew nelson lytle in the hind tit, while wayne gard defends the advantages of industrialization in agriculture's industrial revolution. Both articles convey strong arguments, each supporting the viewpoints over the debated issue of agrarian versus industrialization. _ _ the hind tit is an attempt by an agrarian farmer in the 1930's, to use morality in order to persuade those blinded by the temptation of possible wealth to take a closer look at the negative side of industrialization.

Lytle attacks the claims that machines are more beneficial in farming by saying: but since a power machine is ultimately dependent upon human control, the issue presents an awful spectacle: men, run mad by their inventions, supplanting themselves with inanimate objects. This is, to of follow the matter to its conclusion, a moral and spiritual suicide, foretelling an actual physical destruction 203. He also acknowledges the slogans that were being forced into the heads of farmers at the time, such as: industrialize the farm be progressive drop old fashion ways and adopt scientific methods 204. Lytle's response to these anti agrarian words is: these slogans are powerfully persuasive and should be, but are not, regarded with the most deliberate circumspection, for under the guise of strengthening the farmer in his way of life they are advising him to abandon it and become absorbed 204. On the allures of the luxuries one can acquire from the wealth of industrialization, lytle asserts that the agrarian farmer would lose the already established fortune of life.

Reliable Sources for Research Papers

He says, they also tell him that he meaning his family deserves motor cars, picture shows, chain store dresses for the women folks, and all the articles in sears roebuck catalogues. By telling him how great is his deserving, they prepare the way to deprive him of his natural deserts 206. Also, lytle tries to appeal to the reader by painting a picture of daily life as an agrarian farmer by highlighting a family bond. Lytle ends his argument by saying: any man who grows his own food, kills his own meat, takes wool from his lambs and cotton from his stalks and makes them into clothes, plants corn and hay for his stock, shoes them at the cross roads blacksmith shop, draws milk and butter from his cows, eggs from his pullets, water from the ground, and fuel from the woodlot, can live in an industrial world without a great deal of cash 244. As a farmer struggling with the industrialization issue, i would have been compelled to preserve the agrarian lifestyle after reading this article. The clever language used to portray industrialists, such as false prophets 206 , is more convincing then simply calling someone a liar. He speaks with urgency in his voice, causing the reader to feel that it is their responsibility to take action.