Comparative Analysis Dissertation Writing Text

Jonathan Friesen - Writing Coach

Phd dissertation help editing writing an essay paper halloween phd dissertation help editing. The philippines is an archipelago of 7,107 islands in the south china sea located between taiwan to the north and borneo to the south. Phd dissertation help james franco.dissertation editor specializes in apa 6th, statistics, research, and more! if you have a type of source not covered in the examples given, phd dissertation help ronpaku ask the librarian chicago manual style dissertation to show you the turabian manual. Dissertation writing services in bangalorephd dissertation help james franco essay about nepal in nepali language. Classic compare and contrast papers, in which you weight a and b equally, may be about two similar things that have crucial differences two pesticides with different effects on the environment or two similar things that have crucial differences, yet turn out to have surprising commonalities two politicians with vastly different world views who voice unexpectedly similar perspectives on sexual harassment. In the lens or keyhole comparison, in which you weight a less heavily than b, you use a as a lens through which to view b.

Help In Calculus Homework

Just as looking through a pair of glasses changes the way you see an object, using a as a framework for understanding b changes the way you see b. Lens comparisons are useful for illuminating, critiquing, or challenging the stability of a thing that, before the analysis, seemed perfectly understood. Often, lens comparisons take time into account: earlier texts, events, or historical figures may illuminate later ones, and vice versa. Faced with a daunting list of seemingly unrelated similarities and differences, you may feel confused about how to construct a paper that isn't just a mechanical exercise in which you first state all the features that a and b have in common, and then state all the ways in which a and b are different.

Essays Written By John Locke

Predictably, the thesis of such a paper is usually an assertion that a and b are very similar yet not so similar after all. To write a good compare and contrast paper, you must take your raw data the similarities and differences you've observed and make them cohere into a meaningful argument. frame of reference.  this is the context within which you place the two things you plan to compare and contrast it is the umbrella under which you have grouped them. The frame of reference may consist of an idea, theme, question, problem, or theory a group of similar things from which you extract two for special attention biographical or historical information.

The best frames of reference are constructed from specific sources rather than your own thoughts or observations. Thus, in a paper comparing how two writers redefine social norms of masculinity, you would be better off quoting a sociologist on the topic of masculinity than spinning out potentially banal sounding theories of your own. Most assignments tell you exactly what the frame of reference should be, and most courses supply sources for constructing it. if you encounter an assignment that fails to provide a frame of reference, you must come up with one on your own.  a paper without such a context would have no angle on the material, no focus or frame for the writer to propose a meaningful argument. grounds for comparison.  let's say you're writing a paper on global food distribution, and you've chosen to compare apples and oranges. Why these particular fruits? why not pears and bananas? the rationale behind your choice, the grounds for comparison.

For instance, in a paper asking how the discourse of domesticity has been used in the abortion debate, the grounds for comparison are obvious the issue has two conflicting sides, pro choice and pro life. In a paper comparing the effects of acid rain on two forest sites, your choice of sites is less obvious. A paper focusing on similarly aged forest stands in maine and the catskills will be set up differently from one comparing a new forest stand in the white mountains with an old forest in the same region. thesis.  the grounds for comparison anticipates the comparative nature of your thesis. As in any argumentative paper, your thesis statement will convey the gist of your argument, which necessarily follows from your frame of reference. But in a compare and contrast, the thesis depends on how the two things you've chosen to compare actually relate to one another. Whether your paper focuses primarily on difference or similarity, you need to make the relationship between a and b clear in your thesis.

organizational scheme.  your introduction will include your frame of reference, grounds for comparison, and thesis. If you think that b extends a, you'll probably use a text by text scheme if you see a and b engaged in debate, a point by point scheme will draw attention to the conflict. Be aware, however, that the point by point scheme can come off as a ping pong game. You can avoid this effect by grouping more than one point together, thereby cutting down on the number of times you alternate from a to b.

But no matter which organizational scheme you choose, you need not give equal time to similarities and differences. In fact, your paper will be more interesting if you get to the heart of your argument as quickly as possible. Thus, a paper on two evolutionary theorists' different interpretations of specific archaeological findings might have as few as two or three sentences in the introduction on similarities and at most a paragraph or two to set up the contrast between the theorists' positions. The rest of the paper, whether organized text by text or point by point, will treat the two theorists' differences. You can organize a classic compare and contrast paper either text by text or point by point. But in a lens comparison, in which you spend significantly less time on a the lens than on b the focal text , you almost always organize text by text.

That's because a and b are not strictly comparable: a is merely a tool for helping you discover whether or not b's nature is actually what expectations have led you to believe it is. All argumentative papers require you to link each point in the argument back to the thesis. Without such links, your reader will be unable to see how new sections logically and systematically advance your argument. In a compare and contrast, you also need to make links between a and b in the body of your essay if you want your paper to hold together. To make these links, use transitional expressions of comparison and contrast similarly, moreover, likewise, on the contrary, conversely, on the other hand and contrastive vocabulary in the example below, southerner/northerner .

As a girl raised in the faded glory of the old south, amid mystical tales of magnolias and moonlight, the mother remains part of a dying generation. Surrounded by hard times, racial conflict, and limited opportunities, julian, on the other hand. Feels repelled by the provincial nature of home, and represents a new southerner, one who sees his native land through a condescending northerner's eyes.

copyright 1998, kerry walk, for the writing center at harvard university how to write a comparative analysis. Few college students are able to avoid the infamous comparative analysis paper, also called a compare and contrast essay. This academic standby requires you to compare two things whether you're analyzing two different governmental policies or two different shakespearean sonnets. The key to writing a successful comparative analysis is to establish a good thesis and organizational scheme before you start writing. Sometimes the assignment provides this to you by asking you specifically to compare the use of propaganda in two different governments rather than just to compare two governments or the way a novelist uses physical descriptions to characterize two of her protagonists, rather than just to compare these characters. If your professor doesn't provide a specific means of comparison, you'll need to come up with this on your own. Make a list of the similarities and differences between the two things you're comparing.

Dissertation Comment Rediger