Awa Essays for Gmat Text

Jonathan Friesen - Writing Coach

I demonstrated some brainstorming and identified six objections to this argument. in a memo to the president of omega university, the music department chair argued that the university should expand the music therapy program. The argument presents inconclusive information, offering dubious support, and from this draws unreasonably far reaching conclusions. the evidence cited involves ambiguous language. For example, the argument asserts that the symptoms of mental illness are ldquo less pronounced rdquo after a group music therapy sessions. Of course, calm music will have a soothing effect on almost anyone, but can this be considered a legitimate treatment for the mentally ill? presumably, the benefits of music therapy are neither as powerful nor as long lasting as those of appropriate medications. Simply by making the claim that symptoms are ldquo less pronounced rdquo , the author has failed to indicate whether the improvement is significant enough to merit any serious investment in this new field. The music chair also cites an ldquo increase rdquo in job openings in the field of music therapy.

The word ldquo increase rdquo might mean that music therapy is a wildly burgeoning new field, although nothing suggests that this is the case. Quite rare is the combination of a vibrant professional field and a thriving economy, such that applicants entering this field have ldquo no trouble rdquo finding a job. Even if there are a plethora of jobs in this mental health niche, how do we know that these jobs would go to recent graduates of omega university? surely practitioners with years of experience, or recent graduates of more prestigious universities, would be preferred for such positions. Even interpreting the questionable evidence in its most optimistic light, we hardly can expect that this one field will explode with employment possibilities for omega graduates. This conclusion is far too strong, and therefore the request for funding is not well justified. this music therapy program is already in existence, so presumably it has already had graduates leave omega university in pursuit of employment. Evidence that all these recent music therapy graduates found robust job possibilities waiting for them would enormously strengthen the argument. If we knew the employment statistics of these recent graduates, these numbers would help us to evaluate this argument better. the music chair draws another untenably strong conclusion when he asserts that expanding this program will ldquo help improve the financial status of omega university.

Rdquo when alumni of a university make millions or even billions, and choose to give back in substantial amounts to their alma mater, that undoubtedly strengthens the financial standing of a university. We don rsquo t know the specifics of jobs in music therapy, but their salaries most certainly do not rival those of hedge fund managers mental health services are clearly not a field in which practitioners routinely amass remarkable wealth. Even if the graduates of music therapy had relatively good job prospects, which is doubtful, having a few more alumni with middle class to upper middle class incomes, who, if they choose, may make some modest contributions to, say, the university rsquo s annual fund mdash this is not an impactful issue in the overall balance sheet of university rsquo s total budget. The claim that these alumni will substantially improve the ldquo financial status rdquo of the university is hyperbolically overstated. this argument is neither sound nor persuasive. The music director has failed to convey any compelling reasons for omega university to expand the music therapy program in his department. this is a particular long and thorough sample essay, but it gives you an idea of what it takes to get a 6.

Density Lab Report

Notice that i organized, developed, and expressed my ideas about the argument presented. I didn rsquo t just say, ldquo this is bad, rdquo but i provided a cogent and reasoned critique. Finally, i ldquo controlled rdquo the elements of standard written english: that is to say, a i made no spelling or grammar mistakes, b i used a wide vocabulary not repeating any single word too much , and c i varied the sentence structure employing subordinate clauses, parallelism. As you write practice essays, check yourself afterwards: is every grammatical form commonly tests on gmat sentence correction present in your practice essay? that is an excellent standard to use. How important is it to get a 6 for the awa? how important is the awa section on the gmat. As i discuss in that post, the awa is clearly the least important part of the gmat, less important than either ir or quantitative or verbal, but you can rsquo t neglect it entirely. This sample essay should give you an idea of the standard for which to strive on the analytical writing analysis.

Guide to perfect 6.0 awa gmat score i took the gmat twice and scored 6.0 each time. Being a non native speaker and having not written a damn essay of any kind in many many years, i was very scared of the awa. Pathetic, huh? anyway, for my second time, i just looked over my templates i created and wrote one of each the day before test just to refresh my memory on faster typing without making too many typos.

Enjoy, and please do not blame me if the 6.0 percentile goes down to 80 soon intro restate argument, point out flaws or state intention to discuss them below 2nd para second/in addition. Conclusion the argument is flawed/weak/unconvincing because of the above mentioned. Restate stated in this way the argument: a manipulates facts and conveys a distorted view of the situation b reveals examples of leap of faith, poor reasoning and ill defined terminology c fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated the conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between. Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence. In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing.

Make Your Own Writing Gif

It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation/decision, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate. Going from the templates to full fledged essays the following appeared in the editorial section of a national news magazine: /b the rating system for electronic games is similar to the movie rating system in that it provides consumers with a quick reference so that they can determine if the subject matter and contents are appropriate. This electronic game rating system is not working because it is self regulated and the fines for violating the rating system are nominal. As a result an independent body should oversee the game industry and companies that knowingly violate the rating system should be prohibited from releasing a game for two years.

National Buy Nothing Day Essay

Point out flaws in the argument's logic and analyze the argument's underlying assumptions. In addition, evaluate how supporting evidence is used and what evidence might counter the argument's conclusion. You may also discuss what additional evidence could be used to strengthen the argument or what changes would make the argument more logically sound. The argument claims that the electronic games rating system, although similar to the movie rating system, is not working because it is self regulated and violation fines are nominal, hence, the gaming rating system should be overseen by an independent body. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the basis of which it could be evaluated. First, the argument readily assumes that because the electronic game rating system is self regulated, it is not working well.

There are numerous examples in other areas of business or commerce, where the entities are self regulated and rather successful. Yet, the sport is very popular and successful, drawing millions of spectators around the world each year. Tickets are rather expensive, races are shown on pay per view, and nearly all drivers are paid very well. Another example is the paralleled movie rating system that the argument mentions. The author fails to clarify whether it is working well, but it is clear that the movie rating system is pretty well received by people, who often base their decisions to go see a movie with kids or not on the movie rating. It has never been a case when someone would feel cheated by the movie rating and express disappointment afterwards. Since the movie rating system is also self regulated, it follows that this regulatory method is working pretty well and it is not obvious how it can be the reason for the poor electronic game rating system.

The argument would have been much clearer if it explicitly gave examples of how the self regulatory system led to bad ratings and customer dissatisfaction. Second, the argument claims that any violation fees for bad electronic game ratings are nominal. It thus suggests that this is yet another reason for the rating system not working. This is again a very weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the monetary amount of the fines and the quality of the electronic game rating system. In fact, the argument does not even draw a parallel with the mentioned movie rating system and its violation fines. If any such correlation had been shown for the movie rating system, which supposedly works well, then the author would have sounded a bit more convincing.

Beginning Middle End Writing Paper for Kindergarten