These sections describe in detail the assignments students may complete when writing about literature. These sections also discuss different approaches literary theory/criticism students may use to write about literature. Case tompkins last edited: 2010 04 21 0:30 one of the great struggles for writers in literature is making and sustaining coherent arguments in their papers. Although argument is an essential part of all papers, the literary paper has aspects of rhetoric that are all its own. a good argument in an essay on literature has: rather than broad sweeping statements, a good argument teases out a single aspect of a piece of literature and analyzes it in minute detail: literature under the microscope. Example: loose: ldquo characters in this novel spend time a great deal of time looking at each other, and an examination of those gazes can give us great insight into the characters. Whose gaze is being considered? are we considering the object of the gaze? the person doing the looking? what insight exactly is to be gained? tighter: ldquo when the protagonist turns her gaze upon her former lover in their final meeting, it is her own fears, her emotional blindness, and her refusal to learn from the past that can be read in her eyes as she looks upon him.

It makes an arguable claim about the implications and suggests a close reading to support those claims. a step beyond the teacher rsquo s assignment some may tell you that a good paper rephrases a writing prompt as a statement rather than a question. Instructors want to see evidence that you have read the work in question with enough seriousness to reply to the prompts given in your own way.

a gaze that remains fixed on the work in question when your argument ceases to discuss the work itself and begins to focus on the personal your own reaction or the biographical the author rsquo s life , you need to get back on track. Make no mistake: a sense of audience and information about the author can be important. When these details become central to the essay, however, you are no longer writing on literature.

If you want to show that a particular piece or part of a piece is better or worse than others, begin with your evidence rather than starting with emotion. Rdquo although evidence is vital to a sound paper, the statement above focuses on historical rather than critical evidence. If you include biographical information, always be ready to direct that information back into the main point of the essay. Follow our guidelines and use our format for a stress free approach to writing a good essay.

For example, if the argument claims that a certain newspaper is not selling well because it has recently increased its price, you are not expected to give views on what makes a good newspaper, or on marketing strategies. You simply have to discuss whether the evidence provided warrants that conclusion. For example, in the case of the пїѕfalse causeпїѕ you can explain what alternative reasons or other causes might need to be considered. In the case of inadequate surveys you can explain what is omitted in the methodology.

In the case of misleading statistics and figures you can discuss what is wrong with the information. in order to decide whether, indeed, abc is actually the case, it would be useful to have access to xyz. xyz might include one or other of: expert opinion e.g. Business consultant / statistics / surveys / research data etc follow our guidelines and use our format for a stress free approach to writing a good gre essay. In your initial reading try to find the main conclusion, identify the underlying logic of the argument and identify the major faults. The main categories of logical error that you should be able to spot are: generalizations problems with surveys and statistics false causes false analogies hidden assumptions inadequate authority there is no specific format that the examiners recommend for addressing the analyze an argument task. However, with only 30 minutes to plan and write the essay, you would be advised to work out an approach that suits you. End your paragraph with a statement such as: however, this conclusion seems unwarranted, or however, the information provided does not justify this conclusion or this conclusion is not well supported / fails to convince/ is flawed etc.

For example, if you have been asked to focus on the assumptions that the argument makes, you might use words along the lines of: contains a number of unsupported assumptions that cast doubt on the authorпїѕs conclusion. write 2, 3 or 4 paragraphs to deal with the line of argument according to the specific instructions given. For example, in the case in which you are asked to focus on alternative explanations, you can explain what alternative reasons or other causes might need to be considered. In the case in which you are asked what questions need to be addressed to evaluate the argument, you might find yourself depending on the actual argument in the question focusing on misleading statistics and figures, the source of the information, or dubious comparisons that are made. No one formula fits all the topics in the pool, but you can easily work out the way to address the body of the essay once you have tried a few of the topics for yourself. You should also read the sample essays provided in the official guide to the gre and on the gre website. do not be tempted to copy the wording of these sample essays in your own response. If you are judged to have plagiarised any part of your essay you risk having your score discounted.

The final paragraph is the place to cover what else you would need to know before you are able to decide whether the conclusion is actually valid. This пїѕwhat elseпїѕ paragraph obviates the necessity for a formal conclusion. Useful statements are along the lines of: in order to decide whether, indeed, abc is actually the case, it would be useful to have access to xyz. xyz might include one or other of: expert opinion e.g. Business consultant / statistics / surveys / research data etc depending on the focus of the essay. Suggest that the argument might have a valid point, but that more information would be needed to come to a specific conclusion. /media/images/mba2/the gmat exam/gmat exam format and timing/analytical writing assessment/business student studying male.png?h 267 amp la en amp w 690 /%% /media/images/mba2/system/share links/article mobile/icon weibo blue.png /%% in this section, you will be asked to write a critique of the argument presented. the following appeared in the editorial section of a monthly business news magazine: most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase.

An Essay About Computer

Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. the following is an actual awa essay that received the highest rating: this argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees.

This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. However, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn't necessarily mean that all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,0 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

Contract Law Research Paper Topics

This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analyzing improving the work environment. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on job injuries. For example, toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary.

In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature. In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment i.e. Before any decision is made, all these things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses. Most analytical writing assessment awa analysis of an argument topics are available as a downloadable pdf. Give your writing ability a boost with the analytical writing assessment section of the gmat exam with the gmat write tool.