length: 1165 words 3.3 double spaced pages abortion is defined as: the termination of pregnancy and expulsion of an embryo or of a fetus that is incapable of survival. However, if only the debate over the abortion issue was as simple as the definition provided above. Much like every aspect of human life, a statement is neither right nor wrong, but simply left open for interpretation. Those who refute abortion claim that it is the murder of a helpless baby who has not yet had the chance to live and function as a human being. However, the debate opposite it is just as fervent: it is a woman's right to choose what happens to her body, and if she decides that she is not capable of bringing a child into this world, than she shouldn't be forced to out of nature. These people are better referred to as pro life advocates , or essentially, they advocate the life of the baby over the woman's right to choose. Groups such as human life international hli , the christian coalition, and many others support the right of human life.

A main argument is that one is killing an unborn baby, murdering an unsuspecting life, in their decision to have an abortion. However, they also feel that abortion is a dangerous procedure, and puts the mother at risk as well. There are many people that are willing to take in children people that can't have children of their own. Pro life advocates who are opposed to any and all killing would definitely support finding a home for a baby as opposed to terminating it.

300 Words Essay

Many pro life advocates feel like, 'you choose to have sex, and now you must face the consequences of your actions.' the aspect of playing god has surfaced in recent years. Pro life advocates feel that a mother deciding to terminate her pregnancy is deciding something that god normally would. For example, if god wanted a woman to lose her child, he would have her miscarry. There are many different aspects of pro life that can be interpreted in even more ways. A pro choice advocate is someone who feels that the woman's right to choose should come before anything, even human life.

The main argument of pro choice advocates is naturally that women should have the right to choose what happens to their own bodies. Wade has provided a fundamental basis for nearly all of the laws regarding abortion that exist today. Is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy. However, aside from the obvious issue of whether or not it is a woman's right to choose, pro choice advocates also bring into play the idea of a mother's physical safety. In cases where the mother may be put in grave danger if she were forced to give birth to a child, some people feel abortion should be in recent years, the abortion debate has grown to encompass other aspects of early termination pregnancy procedures.

Partial birth abortions, abortions in the third trimester, and the recent day after or ru 486 pill, now add a new aspect to the abortion issue. Partial birth abortions and abortions in the third trimester are exceedingly controversial, because they involve the termination and/or expulsion of an actual fetus from the womb, where as many early prenatal abortions involve the expulsion of an embryo. It wouldn't appear that one might be more controversial than the other, but in some countries, and for a time in america, partial birth abortions meant that the baby was breached halfway from the womb, and then its neck was broken, killing it instantly. It has since been outlawed in the united states as a result of the numerous outraged pro life, and even some pro choice members who found it to be totally and utterly inhumane. The ru 486 pill is no more controversial than any other aspect of abortion, except tends to raise the aspect of playing god with many pro life advocates.

The ru 486 pill sends messages telling the brain that the woman that was inseminated was already pregnant, and thus the ovum that had been created, is expelled, because the body believes it is already impregnated. However one feels about abortion can be very influenced depending on where abortion is a very sensitive issue. Many people are constantly debating whether or not abortion should be allowed or not.

Others feel that the parents should have the right to choose and it is not murder until the baby is born. People who think it is bad say that the fetus is something alive, a human being who is partly formed and to do abortion is to kill it and commit murder. The people who think it is ok say that it is not murder until and unless the child is born. But if it has already developed into a larger fetus, it can be considered as murder.

For example if there is a complication in pregnancy and the mother can suffer because of the child, i think it is ok to do abortion. The right of an abortion for a mother should be left on her own decision as the mother knows best about her condition. She is going to be the 39 host body 39 for the baby, even though her own, for nine months and according to thompson, the mother should have the right to decide if she wants to foster and go through with the ordeal.

Abortion should not be considered as murder in the early stage, which is the first ten to twelve weeks. Scientific research has proven that even though the fetus starts to develop a face, arms, legs, etc by the tenth week, it does not have a consciousness and it does not constitute as a human being. There have been many arguments over what is right about abortion and what is not. The pro life activists claim that it is an absolute crime to have an abortion at any stage of pregnancy while some of the extreme pro abortionists believe that the mother should have the right to kill her baby even a week before full birth. These two extremes form the continuum over which all the debate has been made over the past few years over the topic of abortions and no concrete decision has been derived out of them.

It is, however, common sense that prevails and leads a person to hold a position that a fetus is not exactly a human being during the first few weeks of conception and that a mother is morally, ethically, and medically permitted to undergo an abortion if she wishes as such niebuhr. People who think like this, such as the national organization for women, want abortion to remain legal and allowed as they think that everyone has a right to choose whether they want to keep the baby or kill it. I think it all comes down to realizing when exactly the act of abortion can become murder. For this, many people think of the ideas about exactly when the human fetus becomes a human being.

Many people, those who are pro life and against abortion, consider the fetus as a human being, as a person from the moment that the cell is conceived. Thompson writes there are many people in this world who think that a fetus is a human being as soon as it is conceived, but that is not the case. A fetus is not human until very late in the pregnancy and in the first few weeks it is only a biological entity that is amidst its developmental stage. It can be very difficult to exactly state at which point the embryo becomes human being.

However, many people agree on the fact that the fetus takes up human form and becomes a human a long time before birth. If they think of the fetus as a human being right when it is conceived, then abortion at any stage would be considered as murder. But even then, is the baby not part of the mother? and does she not have the right to choose to kill her baby if she wants to? overall, throughout the many years of american history, a constant debate has been made on finding out whether abortion is good or bad.

The people who think that abortion is good are called abortionists and those who think it is bad are called non abortionist. In 2003, president bush signed a law to prevent abortion procedures through out the country. This sparked a lot of controversy and organizations like national organization for women opposed this strongly. This group wants abortion to remain legal and accessible as they think that everyone has a right to choose whether they want to keep the baby or kill it.