Telling the story of a historical time or event through a narrative allows you to convey information in a format which is more appealing to those who struggle with textbook style learning. A historical narrative can be written through the eyes of a fictional character or even as the story of a real person from history who experienced the event. The key to a successful historical narrative is providing an engaging story without distorting facts.

Select the main character of your narrative, through whom the reader will experience the historical event. For example, if writing a narrative about the civil war you may wish to write through the eyes of a union soldier. Research the pertinent historical information for your narrative, including important events and living conditions that may be represented in your story, and that will influence the way your character thinks and acts. For example, you could write a series of fake journal entries for the soldier covering his life throughout the entire war, or you could elect to write a third person story about the soldier going through a famous civil war battle. Outline your narrative story, with a beginning, middle and end, showing the key plot points. Reread your story and check the historical details against your research to be sure that you have not taken any creative licenses which make your story historically inaccurate.

Revise your story to fix any historical inaccuracies you noted, as well as areas where you feel your narrative is weak. Repeat the process, rereading and revising until you are satisfied with your narrative. There are so many historical events that when you are assigned the writing of a classification essay of historical events. This is a vast topic, and firstly, you need to know how many historical events to include in the essay. Then, you must think of a way to group and classify them, based on some classifying criteria.

Instead of writing on the historical events of your country, consider writing on historical events of another country. Here, you should consider the length of the essay and go as far back as suitable. If you are writing a five paragraph essay of just 500 words, then stick to a certain period in history. For example, the 1900s from this, you should take three historical events that made the most impact on the country and its people. Similarly, you can consider writing about historical events or significant historical events, historical events that made an impact on women or men etc. You can choose classifications such as events of minor importance vs, great importance, or it could be events in modern history vs, events in renaissance era.

Similarly, your historical classifications can be regional, as european historic events, asian events etc. Another method of writing a classification essay of historical events is by classifying them by particular years. One of the events that stand out during this year is the attack on the world trade centre and the pentagon by terrorists on the 9th of september. An event that preceded this could be the escalation of the israel – palestinian conflict in march. An event that occurred after could be the collapse of the afghan taliban regime, and the entrance of the euro into the world market.

This can be any three historical events that you deem significant per each category. Your classification groups for this essay can be historic inventions, historic political conflicts, historic sporting events etc. Fall of the berlin wall, the disintegration of the soviet union or the election of an afro american president are some historic events for political category.

There are many essay topics worth considering when assigned the writing of a classification essay of historical events in chronological order. Keep in mind if you are in a bind, you can always consider the assistance of a good essay writing service. These writing services will help you produce a great essay that receives a high grade.

One of the cardinal sins of historical analysis is reductionism mdash reducing causes or motives or effects to a single one. Among non professionals this often takes the form of isn't the real reason just. It's an attempt to simplify historical events that otherwise seem hopelessly complex. It often is also often a way for the writer to claim s/he sees behind the curtain, that all those other effects or motives in some sense are not real and that this one effect or motive trumps all the others. That said, the next obvious question is: well, so what do we do? it's easy to day don't do that but is more difficult to say do this. It's easier to rule out that to rule in, because it's hard to say exactly how much to include. I can, however, offer up a starting point mdash a way to begin your analysis without claiming it will carry you all the way through to the end of your analysis.

It's a way to chop up the huge mass of information your research has generated in order to bring at least one form of order to it. It can also provide a sort of check list, to make sure you haven't forgotten to look at your information from all the important perspectives. It's not always the best tool, but if you are utterly stuck, it is nice to know you can pull out the cleaver and hack away.

Some of you have probably learned these divisions here and there, or have developed your own versions and that's fine. As i said, this is here to provide a reference for the lost, and believe me, all of us get lost from time to time. One way to chop up historical events is chronologically, and the three cs can be immensely helpful here. Every event has the event itself, its narrative, and that's the course of the event.

History of Photography Research Paper

For example, economic rivalry and the slavery issue were underlying causes of the american civil war. For example, the attack on fort sumter was one of the immediate causes of the american civil war. The principal difference between the two is that underlying causes explain why an event happened, but they don't explain why the event happened just then. Why this year and not the previous year? or the next year? why do we date the protestant reformation to 1517 and not 1515 or 1520? to explain the timing, you need the immediate causes. To explain the entire event, you need both the underlying and the immediate causes. A common student mistake is to lavish attention on the underlying causes and never get around to the immediate causes.