titles: underline, italics, or quotations? when writing about other works, it's hard to decide when to underline or place in italics a title and when to place it in double quotations. When in doubt, however, these guidelines from the modern language association may help: for titles of written or musical works that are published within other works use double quotations underline or italicize names of works published by themselves: ex. I just read the short story looking for jake in china mi ville's anthology of the same name, looking for jake. I really enjoy the original star trek tv series, especially the episode return of the archons, and the first three star wars films, especially the empire strikes back. I read the story all about the bronx in the city section of today's new york times. We have a copy of edward hopper's painting nighthawks in the writing center lobby. I always think about it when i'm listening to tom wait's cd nighthawks at the diner.

for the names of famous aircraft, ships, and spacecraft, always use italics or underlining: ex. I built scale models of the uss nimitz and the space shuttle discovery last year. For example, the intruder, a short story by andre dubus appears in his collection, dancing after hours.

This can get a little tricky when authors title their collection after a story within that collection. Junot diaz’s collection of stories drown includes a story titled drown. In this case, the use of italics or quotation marks can help the reader understand what’s being referenced the entire book or the individual story. Let’s say you write a poem about a poem and you title it this way: lines after reading the love song of j. Alfred prufrock now, you need to enclose the entire title of the poem within quotations when you mention this poem in a cover letter. The title that appears within the title, then, should be enclosed in single quotation marks: lines after reading ‘the love song of j.

Do People Drop Out High School Essay

Alfred prufrock’ last updated: dec 11, 2014 views: 199633 simply put: no. how to handle titles in apa can be a bit complex. apa's publication manual 2010 indicates that, in the body of your paper. You should use italics for the titles of: beyond apa's specific examples, know that certain types of titles are almost always written in italics. Use italics in a word processed document for the types of titles you'd underline if you were writing by hand. A general rule of thumb is that within the text of a paper, italicize the title of complete works but put quotation marks around titles of parts within a complete work. The table below isn't comprehensive, but it's a good starting point for this paper assignment you must visit a major museum in southern california and select two paintings currently on view, from a time period and by two different artists that we are dealing with in this course or their contemporaries , to compare and contrast in order to elucidate their meaning s. In making your selection, you should look for two paintings that are similar in content subject matter but dissimilar in their form.

Your objective will be to make some claims for how the formal properties of the paintings produce different meanings and/or evoke contrary moods. This assignment requires you to conduct detailed formal analyses of the two paintings and is not research based. You are to compare and contrast the formal properties of the work: the composition and the arrangement of forms, color choices and combinations, the quality and types of line and shape used, the manner of paint application and the use of brush strokes, the massing of volumes in space, rendering of perspective, etc. Please refer to the accompanying document guidelines for writing a successful paper posted to ecompanion for a detailed discussion of how to successfully accomplish the task at hand.

You may include references to lecture material and information from the assigned readings, always with proper citations. Please use proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation and proofread your paper before submission. You must submit a hardcopy of your paper and upload it to dropbox on ecompanion where it will be scanned by turnitin.com.

Remember to attach the proof of museum visit, reproductions of the works that you are analyzing and the originality report generated from turnitin.com to your paper. Poor planning, technological malfunctions, and other excuses will not be granted extensions. Plan to complete the paper in advance of the deadline in case of any unforeseeable problems. Guidelines for writing a successful paper 1 successful thesis statements and supporting evidence successful thesis statements will clearly identify plausible arguments about the two paintings you select.

Successful papers will then support the thesis statements with specific evidence based on what you see in the pair of paintings and what you have learned through course lectures and readings. Successful papers will demonstrate your abilities to identify and describe the visual elements in each painting in the pair you select describe differences and similarities between the two convey your ideas clearly and present your work neatly. Given the space limitation, successful papers will address in great detail only a few of the most significant differences or similarities between the two paintings based on the information presented in course lectures and readings. Explain what factors were responsible for the appearance of the differences or similarities. Please note: in your paper, you do not need to address every possible issue that arises or discover definitive interpretations for the two paintings you select. It is important to think about how to organize the information you want to present and how to present it clearly. Remember that successful papers will combine sufficient details from what you see when you visit the paintings at the museum where they are located with what you know from course lectures and readings.

Thesis statements should appear in your introduction and should provide a summary of what you explain in the rest of the paper. The initial thesis statement you draft may guide you through the paper, but then you may need to revise it as you write. 2 successful analyses successful papers will use answers to the questions below to compare and contrast the two paintings in the pair you select.

Answers to the questions will also constitute evidence that supports the strong thesis statement. There are two fundamental parts to a formal analysis: visual description and interpretation of meaning. Visual description: look carefully at the work of art and put into words what you see. Interpretation of meaning: every formal detail you bring up in the visual description should relate directly to the larger meaning you are constructing for the artwork. The main point of this paper is to address these questions: what do these paintings mean? how do they differ? why do i think this? what am i seeing on the canvas surface that makes me think this? your analysis should include a mention of the artist, date, medium, subject matter, and a thorough analysis of the most important formal properties of the work those which support your thesis. Please additional address the following, if relevant to the works you have location, patron, audience, and function.

3 successful organization and formatting of your paper successful papers will include a clever title, an introductory paragraph, a clear thesis statement, a body that develops the thesis statement with supporting evidence, and a clear conclusion that draws from the information presented in the paper. Title: choose a title that reflects your thesis, rather than one that restates that you are making a comparison. For example, a comparison of two images is a weaker title, but the humanization of the divine in the renaissance is a stronger one. Introductory paragraph: introduce the paintings and ideas that you will develop in the rest of the paper. For example, you may briefly identify the paintings in the pair you selected and provide a few introductory details about it i.e. Thesis statement: write one or two sentences that define the argument you plan to develop in the rest of the paper. Your thesis is the first signpost that tells the reader what to look for in the rest of your paper.

The details you present in the rest of the paper should refer back to the thesis and support it. Remember that a strong thesis statement directly responds to the paper assignment. It does more than acknowledge that there are similarities and differences between the two paintings. A good thesis often identifies specific reasons for the similarities and differences that the rest of the paper will explain in greater detail. In addition, a strong thesis statement often addresses questions like what gives rise to the similarities and differences in the two paintings? body of the paper: write your thesis before you begin writing the assignment. Your thesis should organize the rest of your paper: every point you mention about the two paintings should be selected because it supports your thesis.

Leaving Cert Economics Paper 2013

You may need to revise the thesis statement as you write the rest of the paper and refine your ideas. In general, the body of your paper should be structured into paragraphs that contain evidence that supports your thesis statement. Occasionally you may need to write a paragraph that provides information that is necessary for you to elaborate upon your argument in a subsequent paragraph. Everything you describe in your paper should connect it to your argument, so you should avoid extraneous details. For example, if you write that the figures in a painting are rendered with great volume through the use of light and shade, you should explain why their treatment in this way is relevant to your argument. For example, a well written paragraph often begins with a topic sentence that states the main theme of the paragraph and ends with a concluding sentence that summarizes that theme.