ethics can be defined as a set of principles of right conduct, or a theory or system of moral values. High ethical values are very important to have as individuals, and even more important to have within a corporation. All one has to do is turn their attention to last year’s high profile scandals that cast a shadow over corporate america, reminding us about the consequences of unethical behavior and shady business practices fetrow 54 to realize that high moral ethics are not getting the attention that it deserves. This research paper will deal with an ethically defensible decision and will answer the following questions based around this decision 1.

How might the decision change the ground rules? the situation that i will be writing about deals with employees of decisionone in their interactions with sprint pcs accounts. These are rules that are set forth, usually as expectations, at the start of employment. Other rules or changes in any of the ground rules are communicated to the employees throughout the length of their employment. These should be in addition to their personal ethical values, and are communicated in black and white to eliminate any confusion. Step two expands the grounds rules to encompass what could be included in the rules.

Good English Homework

In dealing with crediting customer’s accounts there are not many unwritten or unsaid rules, as any matter that includes monetary adjustments is clearly defined. Step three follows this common theme, and asks what the ground rules should include. For this example the ground rules are stated in a document that the employees sign during the orientation process. This document sets forth the clear expectations to the employees when crediting sprint accounts. This leads to step four, and also introduces the ethical decision that i dealt with on this subject.

Step four asks the question, what are the ethical implications of the decision? the decision that was made by the employee, in this case, was not an ethical one. When this account was brought to my attention to conduct an investigation, it was clear that the employee in question had applied multiple credits to the account. It was my job to determine whether these were legit credits, or ones that had been applied to the account in an unethical manner. After discovering multiple phone calls that were made between the two parties – right there on the sprint bill itself – it was clear there was only one decision to make. This confrontation started with a face to face confrontation, to gather information from her side of the story, and then eventually to a meeting with my boss that led to a final meeting with human resources. This was a clear case of someone conducting themselves in an unethical manner and thus the decision to terminate employment did not come as a surprise to anyone. The key to making this final decision is to evaluate the process as a whole and determine if we as a management team need to revisit the framework behind the process.

Step five asks the question about how the decision might change the ground rules. This is an important step, because it is during this stage that a company can revisit the whole process and determine what could be done to prevent this from reoccurring again in the future. Although this was a document that everyone signed when they were first hired, it was not something that had been revisited.

Custom Newspaper Article

While the ground rules stayed the same, the knowledge of these rules was revisited with the technicians handling the sprint accounts. Being a vender site, we had to show our client that this type of behavior would not be something that we did not take seriously. By reexamining our process, we determined that it was a process that worked, but also wanted to make sure the knowledge of this process stayed fresh in the minds of those working the accounts.

Literature Review Is The First Step Towards Research

Fostering scientific advancement requires strict adherence to ethical guidelines for research and scientific writing. Several professional organizations have policies to address the ethics associated with scientific writing and publishing, including the committee on publication ethics and the international council of medical journal editors icmje the majority of medical journals follow the icmje's uniform guidelines. We discuss two issues related to ethics in scientific writing: plagiarism and authorship. Plagiarism, the most common form of scientific misconduct, is defined as the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results or words without giving appropriate credit. While plagiarism is often intentional, it may be unintentional due to confusion regarding the definition of plagiarism and how to avoid it.

Persuasive Essay Lesson Plans High School

Other forms of plagiarism include self plagiarism, whereby authors copy large parts of one of their previous manuscripts word for word. Duplicate publication is a form of plagiarism that occurs when an author submits a previously published work as if it were original. An increasing number of manuscripts are retracted each year due to duplicate publication. The incidence of plagiarism is of particular concern among international trainees in the u.s. And in countries where english is not the primary language, and is often due to issues related to language barriers. The major issues related to authorship include determination of author responsibilities and author order. Awarding authorship to people who have not made sufficient contributions conveys benefit to them inappropriately and it reduces benefit to those who actually contributed to the work, while denying authorship to deserving contributors is a widespread violation of scientific integrity.