Does God Exist Essay Textlength: 627 words 1.8 double spaced pages in this essay i discuss why there is proof that there is a supernatural being known as god, who has created everything we know and experience. The mere claim, there could be a proof for the existence of god, seems to invite ridicule. They laughed when they heard for the first time about diseases that were supposedly caused by animals so tiny that you could not see them. They continued to laugh at virtually every discovery that challenged their previous believes in an attempt to preserve the status of have studied for years and must therefore know everything already. Analytical Phd ThesisThey always laughed first but, when things became clear, they must have felt very, very. On the other hand, many well known scientists now admit that certain discoveries tend to indicate that god rather does exist than not. If we picture god as a person, then the question comes up: where is god? however, if we picture god as something that could be everywhere, surrounding us like air or awareness, then, understanding if and what god is all of a sudden becomes a possibility. I am sure you can agree: if there is a god, then god has to exist and has to be aware of his existence can you even picture an unconscious god. But i don't want to presuppose that god's existence is a fact before the proof is established. How, then, do we know this energy exists? the simple answer is, we are aware of it. Did it come from dead matter or lifeless energy as the materialists have us believe? or, did awareness exist first or did awareness co exist with energy, out of which the awareness then formed matter? is awareness a by product of electro chemical activities in the brain? is awareness the out put or the generator? we are more certain considering our thoughts. But, who is thinking and who is aware? whether it is the whole universe or our own thoughts, the question is: who or what is the first cause? it is only logical to conclude that awareness cannot be the product of dead matter or life less energy. How could that even be imagined? yes, i claim that god can be proven indirectly through very convincing circumstantial evidence and directly through personal experience. The body of circumstantial evidence, that has been collected over the years, is tremendous and by itself a proof simply through the overwhelming accumulation of proofs. One could call it prima facie evidence, which is evidence of such a high degree of probability that it is recognized as evidence until the opposite can be proven. I feel that the evidence presented in awareness the center of being delivers such convincing evidence. The quandary of the existence of god has troubled mankind for thousands of years. The existence of god was once never denied, as his presence, his existence was evident in miracles and the people's faith. But time and the advancement of modern science have called god and his very nature into question. The existence of god has been a question that has troubled mankind since it began to think reasonably. It is a free educational service in the public interest, published by the united church of god. essay/term paper: does god exist?essay, term paper, research paper: philosophy essaysst. Some of them are: the disputed questions on the power of god, exposition of dionysius on the divine names and disputed questions on spiritual creatures.Aquinas has been a firm believer that everything had to have a creator and the only possible solution would be something called god. It is with this idea that aquinas's in his de aeternitate mundi contra murmurantes, aquinas insists that human reason cannot prove the impossibility of an eternally created universe. Once again aquinas has written with the certainty that god has to exist in order to have created the universe. There is no doubt in aquinas's mind that everything was created for a reason and that reason was god's will. Aquinas tries to show the different steps that can prove god does exist and that the world had to have been created by god. This article is comprised of five different ways in which aquinas tries to prove that we can be sure that god exists. In the third way, aquinas tries to show that god exists in the article aquinas says that it is possible for things to exist and for them not to exist. Aquinas believes that all things can not be mortal because if it were true, then at some point nothing would exist. What he means is if all things were living things, meaning that they had to be mortal, then at some time these things must also become non existing. Aquinas says that if everything were mortal, then nothing could be existing at present, because what is nonexistent begins to be only through something which already exists. This can be translated to mean that if all mortal things have to stop existing then there can't be anything which exists today. Aquinas believes that it takes a living presence to help create other live things in order for them to live also. This means that there must have been something which existed through eternity to help create living things which aquinas believes that something had to have created life throughout time in order for things to be living today. He says this thing must have existed from the beginning and that it must still exist now. His belief is that living things and non living things have lived through eternity with the help of a higher, more powerful presence. He also says that if it were true that nothing existed at one time, then it would be impossible for anything to begin to exist again, meaning nothing could exist now, which is obviously false. What he means by this is that it takes a living presence to help create other living things. Columbia University Department of Economics Discussion Paper SeriesIt is impossible for anyone to logically believe that things such as rocks, trees, and water can exist without there being a creator. It is for this reason that aquinas believes that god was the only thing that existed then, so therefore he must have been the one who created everything. The problem i did find with this theory is that it doesn't prove that god exists but that something existed. What i mean by this is aquinas calls this thing god but he doesn't prove that it's the 'god' that people believe to exist. Most people would agree that god is something more personal than aquinas' theory of god. Essay on Urban Life Today
© Copyright 2013 - 2016 - www.writehomestudio.com.
All rights reserved. |