science in our daily life 1. science plays an important part in our daily life. Ambreen d/o khizer hayat r/o village narian pirkot tehsil amp p/o hajira district poonch azad kashmir muqaddas noor d/o malik noor ahmed c/o muhammadan science college hajira district poonch azad kashmir ssc m.o 967 10% 9.21 t.m 1100 f.sc m.o 991 1 1050 77.80 42.91 88.15 88.15 complete. People use a lot of what they were taught in school without even thinking much about it. When cooking a meal, we sometimes checks the recipe to measure the portion or double check the ratio of ingredients.

Even setting and checking the timer to make sure the dish cooks for the appropriate amount of time requires math skills. Calculating sales tax, finding the right size and determining which store has the best sale are all mathematical problems. A consumer may have to figure out if 20 percent off an item is better than a r20 discount. When shopping for everyday items at the grocery store, we must be able to count money and make sure they receive the correct amount of change. Saving, spending and investing money needs a fair amount of mathematical knowledge.

You must understand interest rates and calculate compound interest in order to make good financial choices. An investor must consider these factors when looking for the best investments to make his money grow. Playing the stock market requires math to calculate losses and gains as the value of stocks rises and falls.

When purchasing a house, homeowners negotiate mortgage terms based on interest rates and what makes the most financial sense over the long period of time. 1985 nobel laureate in chemistry the role of science and technology in future design will be discussed from the perspective of someone who has lived all his life in the united states and whose scientific experience has spanned the years since the late 1930s. It is likely that the reader will find in my discussion characteristics that apply to many developed countries and developing ones. Inasmuch as scientific progress is highly dependent on financial support and, in modern times, on general societal support, it is appropriate to discuss the interaction of science and society. Using the united states as an example, some of the topics to be discussed are the views of public officials who influence the distribution of research funds, the response of funding agencies and the views of scientists. Finally, we shall look at the co evolution of science and society and attempt to draw some conclusions concerning their related future and the implications for the future of technology. Public officials who are involved in setting or influencing science policy have expressed opinions that indicate that they intend to change the basis for supporting research and development.

They speak in terms of a paradigm shift based on some new perception of the role of science in society. The word paradigm has several meanings, but in the way it is used here the words pattern or model may be good substitutes. In other words, the public officials wish to alter somewhat the pattern of funding for science. Their motivation is to orient research more toward programs that, for example, ensure a stronger economy and improvements in the environment.

It is becoming increasingly apparent that those public officials who control public funds, will be reluctant to fund research programs that they consider unrelated to national needs. An example of priority setting by public officials was the vote in the house of representatives against further construction of the high energy accelerator known as the superconducting super collider. This shift in spending priorities implies that nuclear physics may receive less support in the future if it continues to be viewed as less related to the new national priorities than other scientific disciplines. The effect of the intention of federal officials to shift public research funds toward research programs that serve the national priorities has already affected the nature of the funding available at the funding agencies. For example, at the national science foundation, a small increase in funding for the chemistry division is directed toward so called strategic research initiatives that involve, for example, advanced materials and processing, biotechnology, environmental chemistry and high performance computing. The federal coordinating council on science, engineering and technology identified the current national priority areas as high performance computing, advanced materials, manufacturing research and education, biotechnology and global change. The expressed intention is to get more effort into those areas, but not to have them be entirely exclusive.

Chemistry In Everyday Life Essay 500 Words Text

Essay on My Ambition In Life to Become a Ias Officer In Hindi