In the past several decades, management experts have undergone a revolution in how they define leadership and what their attitudes are toward it. They have gone from a very classical autocratic approach to a very creative, participative approach. Somewhere along the line, it was determined that not everything old was bad and not everything new was good. Rather, different styles were needed for different situations and each leader needed to know when to exhibit a particular approach. It is one in which the manager retains as much power and decision making authority as possible. The motivation environment is produced by creating a structured set of rewards and punishments.

Law Research Paper Format

Some studies say that organizations with many autocratic leaders have higher turnover and absenteeism than other organizations. These studies say that autocratic leaders: rely on threats and punishment to influence employees do not trust employees do not allow for employee input yet, autocratic leadership is not all bad. If it isn't covered by the book, the manager refers to the next level above him or her. This style can be effective when: employees are performing routine tasks over and over. Employees are working with dangerous or delicate equipment that requires a definite set of procedures to operate. This style is ineffective when: work habits form that are hard to break, especially if they are no longer useful. The democratic leadership style is also called the participative style as it encourages employees to be a part of the decision making.

The democratic manager keeps his or her employees informed about everything that affects their work and shares decision making and problem solving responsibilities. This style requires the leader to be a coach who has the final say, but gathers information from staff members before making a decision. Democratic leadership can produce high quality and high quantity work for long periods of time.

Many employees like the trust they receive and respond with cooperation, team spirit, and high morale. Typically the democratic leader: develops plans to help employees evaluate their own performance allows employees to establish goals encourages employees to grow on the job and be promoted recognizes and encourages achievement. It is most successful when used with highly skilled or experienced employees or when implementing operational changes or resolving individual or group problems.

The democratic leadership style is most effective when: the leader wants to keep employees informed about matters that affect them. The leader wants employees to share in decision making and problem solving duties. The leader wants to provide opportunities for employees to develop a high sense of personal growth and job satisfaction. Changes must be made or problems solved that affect employees or groups of employees. Democratic leadership should not be used when: there is not enough time to get everyone's input.

Discussion Psychology Dissertation

laissez faire leadership style

the laissez faire leadership style is also known as the hands off style. It is one in which the manager provides little or no direction and gives employees as much freedom as possible. All authority or power is given to the employees and they must determine goals, make decisions, and resolve problems on their own.

Advertisement And Our Life Essay In Hindi

This is an effective style to use when: employees are highly skilled, experienced, and educated. Employees have pride in their work and the drive to do it successfully on their own. Outside experts, such as staff specialists or consultants are being used employees are trustworthy and experienced. This style should not be used when: it makes employees feel insecure at the unavailability of a manager. The manager cannot provide regular feedback to let employees know how well they are doing. The manager doesn't understand his or her responsibilities and is hoping the employees can cover for him or her. While the proper leadership style depends on the situation, there are three other factors that also influence which leadership style to use.

What personality, knowledge, values, ethics, and experiences does the manager have. The leadership style managers use will vary depending upon the individual employee and what he or she will respond best to. The traditions, values, philosophy, and concerns of the company will influence how a manager acts. if you are the original writer of this essay and would like it removed from ukessays please email the url of this essay to us via the link below. Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members.

Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial in some instances however, there are also many instances where this leadership style can be problematic. Discuss a situation in which you have observed or been involved with personally when autocratic leadership has been beneficial to the leadership process. Provide one personal example of when autocratic leadership has been detrimental to the leadership process in the organization you are involved with.

Authoritarian leadership is a leadership style in which the leader dictates and controls all decisions in the group and task. Often referred to as autocratic leadership, authoritarian leadership is about control, organisation and discipline and while it still has a place in the leader’s toolbox, it was regarded as the most prominent style almost one hundred years ago. Nowadays, it is is seen as a style that can help in certain situations, but only as part of a large suite of tools at the disposal of the flexible leader after all, you cannot force people to change and often, the leader’s role is to challenge the status quo lead effective change in working practices and team behaviours and therefore lead people along the journey to the completion of successful goals. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgements and rarely accept advice from followers. The art of leadership is to be flexible, whereby the leader selects and uses the correct style to suit the situation.

5Th Class English Essays

Most appropriately, if tasks have to be completed with great urgency and are time critical, setting clear tasks and expectations whilst making the decisions seems a logical step, as often there is no time for discussion. Also too, as in the situational leadership model, adopting a more autocratic style is applicable for not only actions that need to be completed quickly, but also if a team member’s skill for the task is very low or novice. In which case, giving clear direction and making the right decisions allows the person to focus on learning or applying their skills. People that normally opt for this style regularly, can be seen as bossy, cold, and a dictator. Let’s just say, if it’s the only style you use, the chances are you won’t be voted as the next best leader sometime soon! long term use of its use can also build to resentment and a feeling of festering, whereby those team members are never given a chance to grow, proceeding to the feeling of being undervalued and distrusted.

Research has indicated that due to the nature of an authoritarian leader, and that he/she makes decisions and controls the group, creative problem solving is often thwarted as a result. Authoritarian leadership has its place in management styles, however, the days of this one style working are long gone. Since the introduction of situational leadership and transformational leadership theories, it is widely regarded that this style is only one of many in your tool box of styles.

Each leadership method has its strengths and weaknesses and must be used when the situation calls upon it. when to use authoritarian leadership? for the long term, an autocratic style can be more damaging than good, but sometimes you have to get things done. Use more of a directing, authoritarian style in the following scenarios: when a task is urgent and needs to be completed quickly, with little time for thought and planning as in the situational leadership model. Use this style when skills are in short supply and people need to be guided through a task or tasks with clarity and structure.