Our writers can help get your essay back on track, take a look at our services to learn more about how we can help. Essay writing service essay marking service place an order the reasons for the outcome of the war, and even the war's name are subjects of contention today. Based on the census of 1860, about 8% of all white males who were aged between 13 to 43 years died in the war. One of the major reasons for the high number of deaths during the course of the war was the extensive use of napoleonic tactics. With the innovation of more advanced rifled barrels, minie balls and repeating firearms like the spencer more weapons were introduced into the battle field and this facilitated more deaths. In the napoleonic tactics, soldiers were mowed down in lines in the open which facilitated the adoption of a warfare technique called trench warfare, which was used a lot during the better part of 1st. Non competitive agrarian society argument the civil war had hardly ended before its interpretations started emerging.

Edward pollard in his book, the lost cause 1867 wrote that the south had waged the war in defence of the non competitive emerging agrarian society. Stephens and jefferson davis defined the lost cause as a politically directed, where the confederacy stood firm for a strict adherence to the federal constitution and resisted the centralization of power in the larger national government. The place of slavery in these southern interpretations was reduced to a pretext northerners had seized upon for provoking the war.

Due to their stand in the agrarian society the southerners were greatly affected by the war hence increasing the number of the casualties of the war gary w. Moral antislavery crusade argument by contrast, the northerners interpreted the war majorly as a moral anti slavery crusade. Arnold argued that the war was as a result of the wicked ambitions of a slave power which was to subvert virtue of the american republican. Americans were faced with the problems associated with industrialization, labour unrest and immigration among others. Scholars associated with this view argued that slavery should be seen as an institutional problem which the war eliminated so as to achieve national unification. However, some professional historians who were moulded by the tradition of economic progression and the world war i horrors, took this as enough evidence that the moral rhetoric of the war had been hollow from the beginning.

Do People Drop Out High School Essay

Massive support for the secession was related to the number of emerging plantations in the region. States located in the far south, that had the largest concentration of plantations, were among the first to secede. The south slave states of north carolina, virginia, arkansas, and tennessee had relatively fewer plantations and were opposed to secession until they were forced by the fort sumter crisis to choose sides. States at the border had fewer plantations and never secede by 1860, the percentage of families from the south that owned slaves was estimated to be around 43 percent in the far lower south, 36 percent in the far upper south and around 22 percent in the border states greatly supported the union. A total of around 80 planters owned 55 or more slaves in 1851 and only 1820 planters owned 90 or more of the latter, 86% lived in the region of the lower south, as opposed to 1% that lived in the border states. According to 1860 united states census, around 393,975 people, representing about 8% of all families, owned approximately 3,950,528 slaves.

Approximately ninety five percent of black americans resided in the south, comprising about one third of the total population there as opposed to the 1% of the population of the north, chiefly in the larger cities like philadelphia and new york. Consequently, fears of emancipation were stronger in the south than in the north. Lincoln argued that the issue of slavery was far much more important than other issues the slavery issue was closely related to competition for control of the existing territories, due to the demand in the south, a slave code for the existing territories was the factor used by politicians from the south to split the democratic party into two, which automatically guaranteed the election of lincoln followed by secession. Who wrote this essay request removal example essays when secession became an issue, a south carolina planter and a senator john townsend, argued that their enemies were about to take possession of the ruling government and that they intend to rule according to the caprices of their theories which he described as fanatical.

Related arguments were expressed almost everywhere in the south in political speeches, editorials and declarations of the reasons for secession. Though lincoln had no plans to prohibit slavery in areas where it existed, whites in the south expressed great fears for the future of slavery. This also contributed to the rise of the casualties of war gabor boritt, why the confederacy lost.

Randall argue that the real factor that instigated the war was the dominance by northerners in big sectors such as industry and finance. They converted the beard's thesis into an echo of the lost cause argument, where the southerners were like helpless victims of cultural and economic aggression of the north. The economic progression argument was greatly challenged by the moral commitments of the second world war. When the totalitarian ideologies were defeated, the moral argument was strengthened once again.

Upsurge of civil war literature encouraged the exploration of many new interpretations of specific certain aspects of the war.perry jamieson and other scholars resurrected the earlier arguments about cultural uniqueness of the south and used them controversially to military tactics of the southerners. Some scholars inverted the old argument nationalist argument and claimed that the confederacy was an example as of a nation building experiment. Others such as george rable have argued that the confederacy saw its political good experiment in the war as a resistance towards ideological uniqueness. The north had more industrialized economy which facilitated the production of munitions, arms and supplies. Statistics shows that the union had a relative advantage over the confederate states of america at the beginning of the war. The northern economy continued growing while the confederate territory economy continued to shrink making the economy weaker and weaker. This difference in economic growth stimulated more tension between the two regions hence making the casualties number more in the disadvantaged region.

The confederate government did not succeed in its attempt to involve europe military in the war. Leaders from the south needed to get help from european powers to break up the barrier which the union had created around the southern cities and ports. Southern population was made up of around 3.5â million slaves and approximately 5.5â million whites, this left the south's white population less as compared to that of the north.

The disparity widened as the union regulated the southern territory with garrisons, and delinked the trans mississippi region of the confederacy. The union in the beginning controlled more than 80% of the steam ships, shipyards, riverboats, and also the navy. Through massive shipbuilding initiative, the union was able to control the river systems and the entire coastline of the south. Connection between union cities made it possible for the quick and cheap movement of soldiers and supplies. Transportation was slower and difficult in the south, which was unable to augment its relatively smaller rail system, damage repair, or even perform regular maintenance of the machines. The confederacy's cotton misconception of the world economy facilitated bad diplomacy.

The emancipation factor enabled black americans, both escaped slaves and free black to join the army of the union. Around 190,0 volunteered and this further enhanced the numerical advantage the union. The confederates, did not try to emulate the equivalent manpower source fearing that it might undermine the legitimacy of slavery. Slaves who were emancipated slaves in most cases performed garrison duties, and were involved in numerous battles between 1864 to 1865. More and more people joined the army making it more and more stronger hence leading to an increase in the casualties of war. As we are always expanding we are looking to grow our team of freelance writers. To find out more about writing with us then please check our freelance writing jobs page.

Concerns of the southerners included not only the economic loss that was evided but also fears of racial equality. The texas declaration of causes for secession stated that the non slave holding nations or states were kind of proclaiming the highly debasing doctrine of equality of all men on earth, irrespective of colour or race, and that the black americans were held and regarded as an inferior and relatively dependent race. Dargan warned that both whites and free blacks were not supposed to live together, if slaves were to be emancipated and remain in the southern region. From this argument, it's clear that economic related issues such as production of goods and services greatly facilitated rise in the civil war casualties. All the above discussed interpretations explain the reasons why the civil war started and why the casualties of the war were so high. The regulating factor in all these interpretations, apart from the debates regarding the merits of commanders or the information of specific battles, has been the understanding associated with slavery.

Leaving Cert Economics Paper 2013

The significance given to the leaders motives, the role of economic related conflict, and the significance of troop and civilian morale, have all in the end generated judgments about the role played by slaves in the war. From the interpretation of the war, it's clear that it was so charged with political meaning and it intensively involved political giving of direction. Scott, assistant professor pan african studies department california state university, northridge one of the major modes of discourse, argumentation can be applied to virtually all assignments involving critical reasoning no matter the subject or discipline. As it involves a higher level of reasoning than associated with descriptive writing, or narrative writing, or expository writing per se, it is crucial for the successful university level student to understand and master the principles, indeed the concepts that drive the critical thinking skills associated with argumentative writing. It also is built around a major premise in this instance, called the proposition rather than the thesis statement. Additionally, there is a definite pattern of organization used in developing the argument.