length: 715 words 2 double spaced pages as the first amendment states, we as americans are given numerous freedoms. Many people feel that with these two freedoms combined they can post on the internet whatever they want. Contrary to what some people may believe, our freedom of speech is not protected when it comes to indecency. This fact, along with several other reasons, is why cyberpornography should no longer be present on the internet. My friend was recently doing a report on black holes, so she decided to take her search on the web. Not as something which is depicted on the internet sometimes in extremely distasteful manners.

If we do not agree with what the government is currently doing we can speak out against them, and not be punished. When the topic of taking pornography off of the web comes up people become very angry. These people feel that their rights are being taking away, but in reality this type of censorship is already present in today's media.

Although, programming on television has changed greatly over the years, there is still a definite limit on what can be placed on the air. If you want to see detailed sex acts you must pay, often very expensive prices for these channels. Society is trying to keep pornography out of mainstream media for several reasons.

If it is not appropriate for television, it should not be appropriate for the internet either. Germany placed a ban on the word breast which kept its users from getting any information about breast cancer. Not only have they blocked their users from pornography, they also cannot look up anything politically indecent. I do not like the idea of young children finding pornography on the internet, but i hate the idea of our government trying to regulate us. Parents could interact more with their children, and accompany them when they log on.

International Business Essay

Some computers do offer a way to block out pornography when doing searches on the web. Everyone has a right to their freedom of speech, but porn is going above and beyond that right. 1997: 96 99, 337 338 censorship has been defined as the removal of material that is deemed or judged offensive to any sector of the population. Many have wondered, just how beneficial is censorship to man, when is it enough and does it help? it is my view however that there is no clear answer to that question, for censorship has its fair balance of advantages and disadvantages. One advantage that most people can agree on is that censorship protects the young, the innocent and the vulnerable. It is built on the premise that we dont always know what is good for us, we dont always discern and as a result we dont always know what should be removed.

However, a research study performed by the concordia university of the united states, found that there are over one thousand images of violence on primetime television per week! people dont realize the effects of this, its desensitizing, there is increased violence and the inability to differentiate reality from fantasy. One example that can prove this, is an incident that occurred in the year 1996 in england. Two year old jamie bulger was kidnapped by two ten year olds outside a shopping mall. They dragged him two miles on a train railway and beat and mutilated his head continuously.

Upon investigation, they said that they had viewed childs play ii over one hundred times and were emulating parts of the movie. However, while this is a valid reason for censorship, i do believe that it goes against freedom of choice. People should be able to choose what they want to view and make their own judgments. When it comes to the young and the innocent, parents should be the primary censors. Which is why i believe that the lack of censorship in childs play ii should not be considered fully responsible for the unfortunate and gruesome incident that occurred. For me it raises the question, where were their parents? for it simply could have been avoided if their parents had not allowed them to view what was obviously not suitable for their age. We choose what we want to see and until we are of age to know what should be viewed and what should not, our parents should accept this role.

Another argument for censorship is that it is necessary to ensure social harmony. Society is made of people from different races, religion and gender and censorship ensures the protection of all rights. They bastardize their art by targeting other groups, sensationalizing certain things. For example, a few years ago, there was a religious group called thusians, they were printing out tracks against hindus and were eventually banned. There was also an incident where a local artiste by the name of sugar aloes sang about the prime ministers wife. It was a condemnation of islam and a death threat was put on his head by religious leader iotolla comini.

Law And Inequality Thesis

This shows that censorship is necessary to protect groups and political matters as some artists cheapen their art form, with their aim being money, fame or some other ulterior motive. While censorship is needed to ensure social harmony, it also negates freedom of speech. People should be allowed to express themselves and say what they feel or believe without being restricted. For with self expression comes responsibility and therefore people should ensure they dont offend anyone.

We have looked at many arguments for and against censorship and i believe people have to decide for themselves, whether censorship is beneficial or not. It is widely used as a means of protecting the mind however it is my view that censorship rarely works efficiently due to the high availability from other sources of what is being censored. For example, a song may be censored or banned due to excess profanity i can easily get the hard core version through several different means. attention. hotessays.blogspot.com provides free sample argumentative essays and argumentative essay examples on any topics and subjects.

Essaylib.com essay writing service produces 100% custom essays, term papers amp research papers, written by quality essay writers only. You can get a custom argumentative essay on censorship now! internet censorship is basically the restriction of what can be viewed, published, and accessed online. There are three agents of power when it comes to internet censorship: governments, companies, and individuals.

Internet censorship has always been a pretty controversial topic for years now as the internet has become a wellspring for information and communication and censorship is a way of shutting off countries and movements to the world. There are thousands and thousands of political blogs online and more than enough governments with unfavorable policies. As a matter of fact, if there’s a policy even if it seems respectable and comes off as doing the right thing there will be a blog to counter the principle of that policy. Governments can block blogs that are beacons for movements that threaten the established power, represent minority or religious groups, or are viewed as extremist. This is often seen in dictatorships or oppressive countries and tends to give that movement more of a push than to silence them. When some topics or views are against the accepted norms of a particular society or culture, censorship and blocking can be put in place.