5 sources cited length: 1419 words 4.1 double spaced pages have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? if he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? he should receive the death penalty! murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event such as murder. In 16th century bc egypt, a death sentence was ordered for members of nobility, who were accused of magic. During the 18th century bc, king hammurabi of babylon had a code that arranged the death penalty for 25 different crimes although murder was not one of them burns. It has been a steady increase up until the 1930s later the death penalty dropped to zero in the 1970s and then again rose steadily. Us citizens said that the death penalty was unconstitutional because it was believed that it was cruel and unusual punishment amnesty international.

Law Research Paper Format

In the 1970s, the executions by year dropped between zero and one then started to rise again in the 1980s. On june 29, 1972, the death penalty was suspended because the existing laws were no longer convincing. However, four years after this occurred, several cases came about in georgia, florida, and texas where lawyers wanted the death penalty. This set new laws in these states and later the supreme court decided that the death penalty was constitutional under the eighth amendment amnesty international. The very first legal executions came in the united states was during the revolutionary war against great britain. British soldiers hung the first person to die by the death penalty, nathan hale, for espionage farrell. The reason that i have included this history is to prove that if something has been working, why stop this from working.some people say that sending the murderers to death row is inhumane because these people deserve a right to live.

This is wrong because they have given up their right to live for the horrible and heinous crimes they committed. Some people say that this is a problem but having more jails built will solve this problem. Having more prisons or jails built may help solve the problem but the death penalty effectively stops draining more money from the taxpayers to house murderers.

These murderers get three warm meals a day they do nothing all day, and have a place to sleep just because the taxpayers fund these facilities. They deserve to get their life taken away from them because of the atrocious crimes that these criminals have done. There are 1,610 whites, 1,490 blacks, 344 latinos, 39 native americans, 41 asians and 1 unknown, since august 5, 2003 death row statistics.

The total executions since 1976 are 870, which seem to be a lot, but in all reality, it is a small number compared to the 3,525 inmates still on death row farrell. With the statistics above it proves that any race can be put on death row, so there should be no problem of putting them to death. The twelve states are michigan, wisconsin, maine, minnesota, north dakota, hawaii, alaska, iowa, west virginia, massachusetts, rhode island, and vermont. These states say it is inhumane to kill someone but i believe if a murderer kills someone they should be killed as well. Less than one percent of murderers are sentenced to death, while only two percent of death row inmates are executed.

Discussion Psychology Dissertation

The reason that this is relevant is because having this many people on death row drains the taxpayer's money. If an inmate has been on death row for over 20 years then he deserves to die because that person is draining the taxpayer's money. In may of 20, a recent study on the death penalty found that 65 percent of the us supports the death penalty farrell.

Advertisement And Our Life Essay In Hindi

With that amount of people supporting the death penalty, there should be no problem putting murderers to death because the majority likes the death penalty. Many people say that the death penalty does not even help because there are not enough people being executed. One major way the death penalty helps is that it could relieve a family if someone is murdered and the convicted criminal is put to death. A perfect example was timothy mcveigh when he was put to death in 2001, which was the first execution by the government since 1963 cnn.com. The death penalty is good because the inmates who deserve to be killed, should be killed. A circular argument is when someone reaches a conclusion because it is true by not proven by facts, in other words the argument chases its own tail. I believe that if the people are just going in a circular argument then there is no way that, the people will gain ground to get rid of the death penalty.

In the year 2002, there were at least 1,526 people executed in 31 countries, and at least 3,248 people were sentenced to death in 67 countries. In addition, 81 percent of the executions took place in china, iran, and the u.s.a. Those facts are just for 2002 and it seems that the number of people executed during this time was a large number. It seems that there is not a large number but if someone was to look at the statistics, it is actually a lot justice for all.giving relief to friends and families for the murders on the their sibling or friend is done through the death penalty. The death penalty solves the overcrowding problem and this process is a humane action.

Many people are losing their tax dollars to the government to pay for death row murderers, while these murderers should receive the death. These murderers do not deserve to live and have all of their expenses paid for committing those crimes. Now, why should anyone agree with not having the death penalty? they should not! the death penalty helps resolve many problems, such as the overcrowding problem. This process is humane and the persons that perform this task are not playing god.

In the future, many problems could be resolved keeping the death penalty and not getting rid of it. 2003 capital punishment, which some also call the death penalty, has been around in society for hundreds of years. Ever since it began, there have been discussions as to whether it is morally right, and as to whether it actually deters criminals. Some believe that the prospect of being put to death often stops criminals from committing violent acts. Others believe exactly the opposite, stating that those that commit violent crimes are driven to do so for various reasons, and whether they have the chance of being put to death or not will not stop them from doing what they feel they must do.

5Th Class English Essays

Society has always used punishment to discourage would be criminals from unlawful action. Since society has the highest interest in preventing murder, it should use the strongest punishment available to deter murder, and that is the death penalty. If murderers are sentenced to death and executed, potential murderers will think twice before killing for fear of losing their own life. For years, criminologists analyzed murder rates to see if they fluctuated with the likelihood of convicted murderers being executed, but the results were inconclusive. Then in 1973 isaac ehrlich employed a new kind of analysis which produced results showing that for every inmate who was executed, 7 lives were spared because others were deterred from committing murder.

Moreover, even if some studies regarding deterrence are inconclusive, that is only because the death penalty is rarely used and takes years before an execution is actually carried out. The fact that some states or countries which do not use the death penalty have lower murder rates than jurisdictions which do is not evidence of the failure of deterrence. States with high murder rates would have even higher rates if they did not use the death penalty.

Ernest van den haag, a professor of jurisprudence at fordham university who has studied the question of deterrence closely, wrote: even though statistical demonstrations are not conclusive, and perhaps cannot be, capital punishment is likely to deter more than other punishments because people fear death more than anything else. Hence, the threat of the death penalty may deter some murderers who otherwise might not have been deterred. And surely the death penalty is the only penalty that could deter prisoners already serving a life sentence and tempted to kill a guard, or offenders about to be arrested and facing a life sentence. Strictly speaking, this is a form of incapacitation, similar to the way a robber put in prison is prevented from robbing on the streets.