length: 645 words 1.8 double spaced pages rating: red free the nature vs. When you hear those two lines you may think they mean the same thing but do they? think about it, you were born into this world a tiny little baby with no ideas, or preferences, but as you grew you developed a personal identity, but did it really develop or was it in you to begin with. If you believe you were born already with a personality, then you take the side of nature. On the other hand if you believe that your personality developed based on influences in your life beginning when you were a child then you believe in nurture. Nature, the more scientific theory of the two, is the belief that hereditary traits found in our genes make us who we are, believable but not very convincing when we consider the theory of nurture. Human beings learn new things everyday, as soon as we come in to the world, our learning process begins.

As a newborn baby, we slowly learn and adapt in order to survive in a new environment which is unlike that of our mothers wombs, our first environment in which we first grew, adapted to and developed in. The home environment parents and siblings play a huge role in determining personality. Influences from outside the family are also very important to the development of ones personality. One can't enjoy snowboarding or claim to like it, until one tries it, without the experience its impossible to say you enjoyed it. Correct? or do you think its already embedded in you're genes that you'll like snowboarding. On the other hand think about it, what if you went snowboarding for the first time and broke your arm deciding then that you hated snowboarding.

Scientists make a good point about genes but i believe physical aspects come through genetics, but that personality development is shaped based solely on how a person has been nurtured through their lives. All children are bad at one time in their lives consider this, a 4 year old girl throws a book at her brother, and is punished she is put in the corner. Of course she doesn't like being made to stay in the corner but she should be able to put two and two together and learn that throwing books is wrong. Circumstances like so represent to us how easily children learn and are influenced by other people. This shows us the process in which humans learn, bringing us back to the theory of nurture learning things is what makes people who they are. As we grow older, we are projected to the outside world, media and friends bring us new theories, which can again change who we are.

We may have been brought up being told by our parents that stealing was bad or that being an average weight was okay. But the media could easily change that belief, or friends could convince one that stealing is okay. Proving that nothing about who we are is a fixed fact, the theory of nature doesn't work.

Buy Real Money Paper

In conclusion, it's obvious that the theory of nurture makes more sense then that or nature. We'd lack all basic skill's, we'd be unable to talk, or walk, we'd be completely different people. One's personal identity must develop through the environment it is what makes us who we are.

23 feb 2016 your physical features can be identified as identical to that of your parents, like your eyes from your father, and the hair color from your mother. However, your personality and talents may have come not from your father or mother. The environment where you grew up may have a lasting effect or influence on that way you talk, behave and respond to the things around you. The coding of genes in each cell in us humans determine the different traits that we have, more dominantly on the physical attributes like eye color, hair color, ear size, height, and other traits.

However, it is still not known whether the more abstract attributes like personality, intelligence, sexual orientation, likes and dislikes are gene coded in our dna, too. One of the hottest issues against nature theory is that there may be an existing gay gene , which explains that gays are actually born that way. Another issue is that the criminal acts, tendency to divorce and aggressive behavior causing abuse can be justified by the behavioral genes once the researchers have proven their existence. On the other hand, the behavioral genes are somewhat proven to exist when we take a look at fraternal twins. When fraternal twins are reared apart, they show the same similarities in behavior and response as if they have been reared together. The nurture theory holds that genetic influence over abstract traits may exist however, the environmental factors are the real origins of our behavior. This includes the use of conditioning in order to induce a new behavior to a child, or alter an unlikely behavior being shown by the child.

According to john watson, one of the strongest psychologists who propose environmental learning as a dominating side in the nature vs nurture debate, once said that he can be able to train a baby randomly chosen in a group of 12 infants, to become any type of specialist watson wants. He stated that he could train him to be such regardless of the child's potentialities, talents and race. Although it is true that fraternal twins raised apart have remarkable similarities in most respects, still the intervention of the environment have caused several differences in the way they behave.

In the end, we are still left with the confusing question: are we born this way, or do we behave according to our life experiences? the nature vs nurture debate goes on and on, but still, it is a fact that we have traits that are predetermined by our genes, but we can still choose who we want to be as we travel through our lifetime. The nature versus nurture debate concerns the relative importance of an individual’s innate qualities versus personal experiences in determining or causing differences in physical and behavioral traits. Almost everyone in any related field has an opinion as to which is truly more important, nature or nurture. The director of a group called the minnesota study of twins reared apart, thomas bouchard, believes that 70 percent of a person’s personality is genetic and 30 percent is due to environment. The director of the lewisville twin study, adam matheny, however, says it is 50 50. A lot of physical development is pre programmed to coincide with brain development and is brought about through nature.

Custom Category Page Wordpress Thesis

Even the cases of identical twins are not a perfect example of nature being superior to nurture. If some of the ties happen to be a coincidence and some happen to be based on vague knowledge of their past, the entire idea is less credible. For example, the fact that the jim twins both named their sons james allen or james alan could be simply naming the child after themselves.