Advances in medical technology have done a great deal to produce miraculous cures and recoveries. In some circumstances however, these advances have created problems for the elderly. More aggressive technology approaches are used to extend the life of the elderly. On the whole the elderly, as well as others, welcome that development even if they fear some of its consequences.

With these advances it has become possible to keep people in a vegetative state for almost unlimited periods of time. Moreover, there are situations in which neither the patient nor the family has the ability to bring such unhappy circumstances to an end. Both the young and the healthy express at least as much interest in planning as those older than 65 and those in fair to poor health. Nurses play a significant role, because they attend to the patient continuously and have an especially strong claim to be allowed the opportunity to be comfortable with the care plan. Advance directives, also known as living wills, are documents that a person can complete to ensure that health care choices are respected. An advance directive only comes into play if a person cannot communicate wishes because the person is permanently unconscious or mentally incapacitated. A 1991 law called the patient self determination act psda requires hospitals and nursing homes to tell patients about their right to refuse medical treatment.

Some people list every medical intervention they do not want, while others want to make clear their request for heroic measures at any cost. It is crucial that the issue of advance directives and the issue of euthanasia not be confused. Advance directives are seen as a way to protect one's legal rights fo medical essays arent just for aspiring doctors the topic is relevant in nearly any subject, from business studies to physical education. Topics cover a range of current events, as well as history, ethics and sociology. Most people agree that medical care is good and important, but this is where the harmony ends. Here are some good topics for a persuasive essay about medicine: universal health care its been in the news lately, but universal health care also touches on historical issues such as how it has been implemented in other countries ethics and right to treatment, and socio economics.

Higher level essays should isolate an issue within universal health care, to give your essay more depth. right to die assisted suicide is legal in some countries like holland and a taboo topic in others. An essay about assisted suicide can delve into the legality in general for or against or illustrate the specific conditions in which assisted suicide should be acceptable. health insurance like universal health care, health insurance is a huge, divisive topic. Choose a sub topic about health insurance, such as compulsory insurance, experimental treatments or the ethical considerations of denying coverage to ill patients. abortion abortion is an incendiary topic, which makes it an obvious option for a medical essay.

Because medical treatment differs widely around the world, there are lots of comparison topics within the subject. Here are some essay ideas: treatment options choose an illness, such as clinical depression or cancer, and compare and contrast the different options available. treatment availability compare and contrast the medical systems and availability of doctors within two areas, locally or internationally.

Your thesis can also draw a conclusion about which system is better or, briefly, how the contrasting system might be improved. medical history provide a comparison and overview of medicine throughout history, such as public opinion, doctor education or religious input into the medical community. An expository essay about medicine will teach your audience about a specific topic. Choose a particular subject within the areas of: illness/disease treatment options physician qualifications healthcare laws remember that an expository essay is used to explain something it should not include the authors opinion on the topic. Moral management is always important in organizations, especially nowadays people are more sensitive to the issue of ethical behavior on both organization level and individual level in workplace. Healthcare today has become an increasingly complex and troubling enterprise for patients, families, healthcare professionals, and society. Moral management of healthcare organization, human treating human anatomically, physically and mentally, is more different and important than other the other common business.

A real ethical story that was happened in u of m was presented here that involved some ethical issue on the individual and organizational behavior within the healthcare organization. Moral management is always important in organizations, especially nowadays people are more sensitive to the issue of ethical behavior on both organization level and individual level in workplace. Advances in scientific technology and changes in the delivery of healthcare have made it increasingly evident that optimal healthcare requires more than scientific excellence.

High quality healthcare also demands attention to ethics, including issues of human values, law, and public policy. The case i am presenting here is a real ethical story that happened in the university of michigan. Joseph oesterling was a division head of the division of urological surgery in the university of michigan in the mid 90's, and he was a young, energetic and fast rising star in prostate cancer field in the nation. After his residency and specialist training in the john hopkins university under the internationally renowned urologic surgeon patrick walsh, he, at the age of only 36, joined and became head of the urology at the u of m in 1992.

He quickly became nationally recognized leading surgeon in the prostate cancer field and editor in chief in the international journal urology advisory regarding dr. Indeed, just as what he claimed, he works 15 hours a day, seven days a week, and hasn't taken a vacation in three years. But how can such a promising doctor perform the acts that don't seem to be ethical? did he really do anything wrong? what exactly did he do wrong? one day in 1996, a temporary secretary sorting mail for the urology chief oesterling opened an envelope and found a $50 check. The letter also mentioned an earlier $7500 contribution to the national prostate research foundation at the u m. Where would the money go? the check triggered an eight month investigation on dr.

They found oesterling had established three florida based foundation/companies, not at the u m. The foundation was oesterling's primary company for attracting thousands of dollars in contributions from drug and medical device companies. Most of the money that was intended to contribute to the foundation for prostate cancer research was actually sent to oesterling's home. Some of them were never deposited to the foundation's bank account but instead were cashed by him. The report of the investigation showed oesterling did not disclose any of his business contracts with outside companies to u m, which is required, or fully described them to the american urological association, as the association requires when a doctor presents research at conferences. He received hundreds of thousands of dollars from more than a dozen drug companies that he failed to report. Such as in july 1996 he deposited $117,144 in his bank account, only $19,293 of that amount was from a u m payroll check.

Additionally, in several occasions, oesterling double and triple billed to u m, drug companies and medical device companies, and urological associations for the same trips, cab rides, hotel bills, and other expenses kamins, 2003. Oesterling's research and prescribing practices also were in question because he made thousands of dollars from companies whose products he studied or promoted. For example, oesterling wrote to pharmacies at u m and the va hospital in ann arbor to recommend a prostate cancer drug just three days after he received $25,0 to his prostate cancer foundation from the drug manufacturer. And received stock options for 10,0 shares while conducting a clinical trial study on two procedures using the device made by the company for treating enlarged prostate glands. The study required that patients be assigned randomly to receive treatment by either this device or the traditional procedures. But oesterling selected patients in a nonrandom manner that might result a biased outcome in favor of the device. He presented his findings to the american board of urology he praised the new procedure without disclosing his financial interest in the company.