Period 3 23 march 2015 the meaning of life you will never be happy if you continue to search for what happiness consists of. You will never live if you are looking for the meaning of life camus. If you spend your whole life searching for one thing you will waste your life and it will only take a few. The meaning of lives in her article the meaning of lives, susan wolf, a moral philosopher and philosopher of action, investigates whether meaning can exist in lives without postulating the existance of god. Wolf establishes her position on this philosophical question from an agnostic perspective and.

Glasgow University Essay Checking Service

Humans appear to be the only creatures with the capacity, or inclination, to analyze these attributes of existence. Although all people are capable of contemplating their place in the universe, a significant proportion of them do not, and simply focus their attention on concerns which impact their day to day lives. This is not necessarily a negative thing for it is the way almost all other life forms exist.

However, due to our sheer numbers, and the impact this has on the environment, a segment of mankind must be aware of the consequences of various human activities, and act to influence the direction we take otherwise nature will take its course , with dire consequences. Contrary to what we are conditioned to believe, politicians and the rich do not represent the brain of our species. The majority of these people function on a very simple level, their desire for power and wealth a manifestation of the purely sexual competitive drive. Most individuals who enter politics receive a relatively modest salary, considering the responsibilities of the position, yet, of those not already rich, many leave politics as multimillionaires it is interesting that their total income during their time in office amounts to a few hundred thousand dollars, while their bank accounts grow disproportionately. Leaders of industry and government are typically people with the gumption to exploit the apathy of the general populace, and on a conscious level, are driven by self serving impulses. The fact that they often have above average intelligence is somewhat insignificant. Mental acuity is merely a human measure of value nature has no use for mathematics: everything is measured as enough , not enough , or more than enough.

An extensive vocabulary, a capacity to benefit from a costly education, and the ability to retain specialized knowledge, may be qualities respected by humans, but ultimately they are only characteristic of a portion of mankind itself only an infinitesimal part of an interminable organism. The worth of a creature or species is subject to its complementary relationship with all other life, and not its specific attributes. Lesser primates have rated as high as the equivalent of the thirty fifth percentile on human intelligence scales, which means that thirty four percent of people are less intelligent than some apes.

This does not make these particular apes human, nor a third of us orangutans and chimps that which is innate, and species specific, identifies us as what we are. Intelligence is the measure of one’s ability to reason, and although it is often related to knowledge and wisdom, these mental attributes are not dependent upon one another. A person can score poorly on an intelligence test, yet be wise and knowledgeable. If you do not have to reason out an original problem yourself, then the other abilities may well be of greater value than any amount of intellect. The most brilliant of minds is severely handicapped, and may even be dangerous, without the qualities which enable foresight. The people who created the first atomic bomb were concerned that there was a possibility the explosion would cause a chain reaction involving the hydrogen in our atmosphere. They went ahead with their plans, determining that a quicker victory in the war was worth the risk of eliminating all life from the face of the planet.

Cmc Essay Help

These scientists were obviously intelligent, yet lacked the wisdom to ascertain what constitutes an acceptable risk. Every person possesses varying amounts of intelligence, wisdom, and knowledge the latter two being very difficult to measure. Contemporary society tends to try and gauge these characteristics in material/sexual ways: someone who gains materially is consequently considered as a good potential provider or mate, and is obviously gifted with one or more of these mental attributes. Such a judgment is all well and good from the perspective of animals striving to preserve their genetic legacy, but does not address a situation where said animals are on a path to self destruction. There are people who apply their abilities in an esoteric way, with concerns that go beyond simple mating.

Such individuals rarely receive notoriety in society, yet those with an exceptional aptitude for leadership have occasionally attained legendary status. Men such as mohandas gandhi, socrates, siddhartha gautama, and k’ung fu tzu have been focal points for others who also share a more complex awareness of reality. These leaders would have accomplished little without the participation of that portion of society which thought as they did. Gandhi won india’s freedom from britain through passive resistance, yet it was not gandhi himself who taught the english that it would no longer be profitable to rule over the indian people, but the sum of all those who believed in his idea and took action some sacrificing their lives for the greater good when england responded to peaceable assembly with deadly force.

Many ancient leaders did not write down their thoughts, and many of the great philosophical minds adopted a celibate lifestyle they left no written record nor genetic legacy, yet their wisdom lived on in the people who appreciated the worth of their contributions to mankind. Herein lies the value of those who would seem to be of secondary importance, for these often nameless individuals perpetuated the knowledge which would otherwise have been lost, and subsequently were as noteworthy as the original mentors. A number of historical figures achieved little recognition during their own lifetimes it was the efforts of a few lesser lights who later established their significance. Every movement that has changed the course of humanity was the result of the actions of a great many people. The leaders who sparked the beginning of a transformation were formed by their experiences, including their encounters with numerous individuals who influenced their thoughts. Each movement succeeded due to the participation of others and like the snowflakes that lead to an avalanche, not only is there a point where just one more triggers the event, each and every tiny snowflake equally contributes to the cause of the effect. The catch phrase one person can make a difference is perhaps more accurately restated as one additional person can make a difference.