The issue of euthanasia, or assisted dying, is incredibly controversial and there are legitimate concerns on either side of the debate. Today i will propose a motion to the british medical association's annual conference in liverpool, which states: this meeting supports the introduction of legislation to allow people who are terminally ill but 'mentally competent', the choice of an assisted death. Further, the law should not criminalise people who accompany those who make rational decisions to end their suffering the motion will seek to take the issue forward in a compassionate and fair way that i believe will serve the interests of the terminally ill and our society. The starting point has to be in the law, which at present is failing, as shown by the recurrence of cases in the courts that often place relatives, already dealing with the painful loss of a loved one, in the middle of distressing legal battles. There is clearly a desire – whether we like it or not – among a number of patients at the end of often terrible battles with debilitating, incurable diseases to end their suffering with the support of their relatives.

To deny this right is to prolong the suffering for individuals and families, something that i can simply not condone. I do accept though that this is not like any other clinical decision – and that if society is to offer this solemn choice it must also build in safeguards to its laws that not only rectify the inadequacies of the current situation, but also protect the vulnerable, the weak and all those – doctors and nurses included – who are involved in this incredibly difficult situation. As a start we must enact legislation to decriminalise acts of euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Some of the reasons that are compelling enough for us to change our laws are: to allow a terminally ill individual to end their life is the only humane, rational and compassionate choice.

The current prohibitions require a person with great physical and/or mental suffering to continue to endure their suffering against their wishes, which cannot be right. The right to life and the right to private and family life under the european convention on human rights should be interpreted broadly to include decisions about quality of life, including decisions about death if the life is no longer one of quality. The terminally ill are travelling abroad to countries where the right to end of life in terminal cases is recognised and is lawful. We must make provisions within our laws to regulate this issue within our boundaries under our control and supervision. We must not prosecute loved ones for encouraging or assisting suicide who enable or assist a terminally ill individual to travel abroad to end his or her life lawfully. If the laws as written were being enforced, over a hundred people would have been prosecuted for accompanying their loved ones abroad to help them end their lives. This ambiguity and uncertainty leaves all concerned, including physicians, unprotected.

Doctoral Dissertation Assistance Kissinger

The ability of the wealthy to travel to countries where it is lawful for the terminally ill to end their lives has the discriminatory impact of treating the haves and have nots unequally. But our concerns relating to abuses and protection of the vulnerable can be addressed by ensuring that certain objective safeguard conditions are met prior to allowing a terminally ill individual from exercising his or her right to die with dignity. Some of the safeguards include the following: the patient must be terminally ill. Two independent physicians must be satisfied that the above conditions are present. In conclusion, the only humane choice is to allow individuals who are suffering to choose to end their suffering. Further, the discrepancies in the laws as they exist and how they are being enforced have led to uncertainty.

This uncertainty leaves the doctors, their patients and patient's loved ones unprotected. If we do not address these issues openly and head on, we will have continued uncertainty and unregulated practice of euthanasia or assisted suicide with the fear of prosecution hanging over the heads of all concerned. The goals of the medical profession should continue to remain one of saving lives but this should not be at the expense of compassion and a terminally ill individual's right to choose to end his or her life and die with dignity. Dr kailash chand is a gp in greater manchester below is an essay on why human euthanasia should not be made legal from anti essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples. Euthanasia should not be made legal after hours of stale hospital coffee in the waiting room, the doctor finally arrives with the prognosis. We are sorry ma’am, but i regret to inform you that when your mother slipped on that patch of black ice, she broke her hip i also see that you don’t have medical insurance, so unless you have enough money to cover the cost of a new hip, i am afraid that it would be more cost efficient for us to just put her to sleep.

This is how the doctor’s in this country might become if they are ever given a license to euthanize a human being. This point is emphasized in why doctor’s should not kill people, in the mercury reader. The reasons for this stance are as follows: there are many ways to give a patient a dignified and painless death, when people sometimes ask for death, they might not be in the right frame of mind, and doctors are there to help us live, not die. When people have a terminal illness, they already know that they are going to die, so they want to make the best out of whatever time they have left. The most comfortable death to many people simply lies at home with his or her family. For people that die at home, they do not have to worry about machines being the last thing they hear, they can go with the sounds of their family reciting a prayer over them. They do not have to stare at the bright, blank walls as they leave this earth, for they can smile at their family looking back at them and enjoy a truly peaceful death.

Morphine has the ability to simply erase all of the bad feeling in a person’s body, as well as. Some believe that euthanasia should not be allowed as, from a religious viewpoint, only god has the right to take one's life. In this essay i will consider whether euthanasia should be legalised in the uk and it will consider religious arguments to decide my conclusion. Euthanasia is described by the oxford dictionary as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease or in an irreversible coma. Active euthanasia is when a medical professional or someone else deliberately does an action which causes the patient to die. Withdrawing treatment is when someone removes a feeding tube or switches off a life machine which is keeping the patient alive. Many feel that it is not a priority for medical professionals, who they claim disregard it as a less glamorous opportunity.

Christianity states that life is a gift from god and only god had the right to end a human's life. Birth and death is considered as part of life's process and which god has ordained and so we should we respect them. Churches say that euthanasia should not be committed because it means humans are interfering with the natural process of death. The ability to decipher between right and wrong and so as people develop this ability they live a life close to god's love.

Dissertation Services Uk Guidance

This means the aim of life is to strive towards achieving god's love and kindness. No one can stop someone from their aim and life must be preserved so a person can achieve the aim of life. Another argument put forward is that to suggest euthanasia is propose that the patient's life is worthless and this is not the case in the eyes of god.

And if a patient is in a vegetative state this does not mean their life is worthless as every human's life is valued the same in the eyes of god. Both euthanasia and suicide are explicitly forbidden in islam due to the fact that muslims believe that allah is omnipotent. If allah wishes then he could cure the patient in an instant and relieve his pain. By default my conclusion is that euthanasia should not be legalised in the uk due to the fact that i am a muslim. But by taking all the arguments into account it is rational that a person should if they are in unbearable pain, only then should they be allowed to kill themselves as they would rather die with dignity and die a painless death. However i think that if euthanasia was legalised then it would cause people to hurry their decisions over life or death and it would become impossible to stop. Although it does seem rational the fact of the matter is that it isn't possible as it would become an on demand thing where people who are in little pain just decide to kill themselves.