Hurston's ldquo their eyes were watching god rdquo presents several themes such as speech and silence, love and marriage, and finally gender roles. Zora neale hurston does an outstanding job of instituting what men such as joe starks believed were the standard roles for the african american female. Hurston pertinently described janie through her relationship with joe, the metaphoric value of the mule, and her dialogue as a woman of strength, not concerned with the ideals of her white female counterparts, sitting up on a high chair and overlooking the world. In order to revise your writing well, you need to come as close as you can to reading it as if you hadn’t written it. You need to try to see and hear what you have just written as if someone else had written it.

This is not an easy thing to do, but it can be done, and it gets easier with practice. And if it is new writing, writing that will be evaluated by others, writing that isn’t finished yet, we will probably feel more defensive. Most of us experience some of the cognitive distortions, to a degree, when we are writing. This mental filter can be either positive or negative: i can filter out either what is good about the writing or what is flawed about it. The specific form in which we distort our view of our own writing varies with each of us. Sometimes, when you read a draft that you have recently written, you will be unable to imagine it any other way, unable to think about changes, locked in to the way it is.

Other times it may seem completely hopeless, and it will seem that the only possible thing to do is to start over from scratch on a completely new topic. Your first reaction to your writing is almost always based on your automatic thoughts. In fact, another way of describing the difficulty you have seeing what you really wrote is that you are reading your essay at an experiential level and are incapable of reflecting on it. In order to do that, you want to be able to see it as if you were someone else, who had no personal interest in the writing other than what the words on the page could create. Read your essay from the perspective of someone who comes to your essay with no interest in your topic.

One way to get a different perspective on what you have written is to try to assume that you are a reader who does not have a prior interest in the topic. What i am most often likely to leave out of a first draft, therefore, is the material that will motivate readers to care, to take an interest in what i’m saying. I can see these omissions only if i try to see the essay through the eyes of a reader who doesn’t share my interests. Could a reader respond to your essay not so much with agreement or disagreement as with a big so what? try to read your essay with a so what? attitude in order to find out what you need to do to interest and motivate those readers who don’t think as you do. I’m not saying that you should necessarily try to assume the perspective of someone who strongly disagrees with what you have to say. The doubting reader might hold different opinions than you do or might simply be uninformed about the subject of your essay. Get honest readers to read your essay and try to really understand their responses.

The first two techniques above are ways of pretending that you are not conditioned by the automatic thoughts that are distinctive to you, of pretending to have another perspective. If their reaction to your essay is boredom or disinterest, they might well conceal the fact. When faced with real criticism, it’s very easy to fall back into personification and blame, identifying with your writing and blaming the critic. If you can recognize the potential value of responses from real readers, however, you will mine them for all they’re worth. The reader who completely misunderstands what you are saying is often the best possible source of information about how to improve your essay.

I’ve discussed some of the ways of handling these problems in thinking about peer review. If you make a real effort to understand how your readers think about what you are saying, it will almost always lead you to improve your writing. Could you please tell me how you find the first paragraph? any suggestion is welcome.

Views expressed in this community do not reflect the views of mediacet ltd, and we are in no way liable for such content. Offensive or malicious content will be removed immediately, please send an email to [email protected] when writing their eyes were watching god analytical essay. In case you cannot boast of being a professional analytical essay wrier, attentively read through the tips provided below.

To cut the long story, analytical essay is a well reasoned response to a certain question and it is based on a logical argument organized around the solid evidence. The key to a professional analytical essay writing on their eyes were watching god is about proper organization and thorough research. When dealing with the work of literature, research means to read the novel from the first page till the last one.

The key to a successful analytical essay lies in breaking down the project into essential parts that will be later analyzed. The subject of their eyes were watching god analytical paper can be just about anything. The author dedicates a huge part of her work to the treatment of the community of african americans. At the times described in the book the blacks were usually marginalized on the pages of almost all works produced by white writers. In contrast to her colleagues, hurston provides a complex and full view of black community highlighting the brightest aspects of it: colorful humor and hooking storytelling by means of play and language. Generate a working thesis statement that will indicate what you’re actually planning to accomplish by means of the analytical essay on the novel. For example, if you’re about to answer the question of relationship aspect on the pages of the novel, feel free to claim that janie’s relationship with tea cake gives her and opportunity to be herself.

The marriage is pretty stormy, full of ups and downs, but nevertheless, in their tempestuous union, janie can fully express her inner self, including her bright masculine side. It will be more difficult but still engaging! to study the watching god or going to god theme. Make sure to provide your thesis statement as the answer for the following question – why would janie recommend that everyone should find god? it is highly important to state that her recommendations are not similar to the traditional understanding of reaching god. Thus, your thesis statement may look like janie manages to find god in the storm. The fury and force of the hurricane causes the main character and her pals to search for a deeper meaning behind the life storm. As one of the reasonable answers to the thesis statement question, you can state that their eyes were watching god in order to find a certain meaning behind the nature’s creation and fury, and their own fate.

Create a brief summary or make a list for all the facts you find interesting about the subject of analysis. In view of the fact that you’re working with a piece f literature, write a summary. Thus, you will find out whether or not you’re aware of all the peculiarities of the subject you’re analyzing. Write down relevant citations from the book to back up your views and make your paper juicy. Restate and sum up what you’ve already stated through all of the body paragraphs. their eyes were watching god is a novel that was written by an african american author, zora neale hurston.