is a new academic network just a cover for climate activists? shelf of climate skeptic books over at his bishophill blog, andrew montford draws our attention to a one day seminar scheduled for this may. Hosted by the university of east anglia the origin of the climategate e mails , the event will inaugurate a new writing and science network. The seminar will feature: playwrights, novelists and journalists in conversation with scientists and activists italics added six speakers are currently listed on the seminars web page. Whose website describes him a campaigner, writer, sustainability advisor and leading british environmentalist.

The second is mike hulme, a climate change professor at the university of east anglia uea and the author of the 2009 book, why we disagree about climate change. But its difficult to forget the august 1997 climagegate e mail 087220206 that reveals a greenpeace employee drafting a letter to the editor for hulme to sign. the times had apparently run an editorial that discussed greenpeace and bp, the petroleum giant.

How to Write a Critical Analysis Essay of a Film

But rather than submitting the letter itself, greenpeace persuaded hulme, together with anthony mcmichael. In other words, academia has been in the business of dressing up activist views as science for some time. The public was told, 16 years ago, that scientists were expressing these opinions the letter contained the phrase as scientists studying the impacts of climate change but behind the scenes, greenpeace was actually pulling the strings. According to his biography on the seminar webpage: tom is actively engaged in environmental politics, both at the level of direct action and as a member of the green party.

Rebecca stott, who teaches literature and creative writing at uea, is the fourth speaker. Shes the author of several works of fiction and non fiction, including one that sounds genuinely fascinating: darwins ghosts: the secret history of evolution. Then theres ro randall, a psychotherapist interested in human responses to climate change not just the familiar, outright denial but also the anxiety, distress, despair and grief which are often hidden behind defences of disavowal, apathy, disinterest and projection. Randall is described as a founder of the climate psychology alliance, which seeks to make a useful contribution to the task of mobilising a relevant collective response to climate change.

The alliances website tells visitors about our major conference with polly higgins. Shes the uk lawyer who thinks there should be an international law against ecocide. In blog posts here and here ben pile argues that higgins is proposing a kind of green totalitarianism.

The final speaker at the writing seminar is kirsten shepherd barr, who teaches drama at oxford, and who has written about how science is portrayed on stage. Of these six speakers, therefore, one is a leading british environmentalist, one is a green party member actively engaged in environmental politics, and one is a psychotherapist who seems keen to apply pejorative labels to those of us who ignore or question climate change dogma. Two other speakers appear to be non activist academics, and the final one is a climate change professor. Whats missing from this list? anyone from the climate skeptic side of the fence, of course.

Even if one considers only book authors from the uk, surely one or more of nigel lawson , andrew montford , james delingpole. People have been writing intelligent books of a climate skeptic persuasion since at least the late 1990s. Surely a university interested in establishing a writing and science network should be inviting a range of perspectives. Otherwise, it has no right to pretend theres anything scholarly about this project. It is already happening and represents one of the greatest environmental, social and economic threats facing the planet. The warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global mean sea level.

Most of the warming that has occurred over the last 50 years is very likely to have been caused by human activities. In its fourth assessment report projects that, without further action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the global average surface temperature is likely to rise by a further 1.8 4.0°c this century, and by up to 6.4°c in the worst case scenario. Even the lower end of this range would take the temperature increase since pre industrial times above 2°c the threshold beyond which irreversible and possibly catastrophic changes become far more likely. The climate can affect every person and our health directly through increases in temperature. Such increases may lead to more extreme heat waves during the summer while producing less extreme cold spells during the winter. Particular segments of the population such as those with heart problems, asthma, the elderly, and the very young can be especially vulnerable to extreme heat.

Nowadays there are so many factories that exhale really destructive substances and pollute the air. Ground level ozone can damage lung tissue, and is especially harmful for those with asthma and other chronic lung diseases. Sunlight and high temperatures, combined with other pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds, can cause the ground level ozone to increase.we cannot escape from the polluted air it’s everywhere, even in our homes and we are breathing it non stop. Mountain glaciers and small ice caps are melting as well as greenland’s ice sheet and the antarctic ice sheet. Some greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide occur naturally by natural processes and other are created and emitted solely through human activities. For example carbon dioxide is entering the atmosphere because of human activities like burning of fossil fuels oil, natural gas, and coal. As a conclusion, i think that when it can not do both, the un should prioritize combating climate change over reducing poverty.

Of course, poverty is a big issue, which needs a solution but have you ever asked yourself why the poor countries like bangladesh, gambia, zambia are poor and why so many people die? it’s because the climate doesn’t allow them to grow food and they can’t afford to buy it from other countries. The climate is a very important thing and if we don’t stop the changes soon, more and more plants and trees are going to die, we won’t have enough food and then not only will the third world countries suffer from hunger but so will the whole world. I think it is better to first stop the changes in climate and then gradually reduce the hunger in the poor countries. Because if we stop the changes, we are going to be healthier and everything around us will be cleaner and it will be how it actually should be. ϻ�climate change is the most significant challenge to achieving sustainable development and threatens to drag thousands of people to severe poverty.

It refers to any outstanding measures of climate lasting for an extended period of time. This includes major changes in temperature, precipitation or winds. Framework convention on climate change seeks to commit the international community to a shared vision for long term co operative action.

In reality however, tackling climate change continues to pose unique challenges for the international community. Discuss introduction climate change is perhaps the defining. There are also more companies answering their plea to: write an essay for me and some are much better than others. Students should consider the following points when looking for essay writing services to write essay for me. This is one of the main concerns of students, as they do not have a lot of cash to spend freely. A company should offer their services at reasonable prices, but this should be compared to the quality of their services. If the price is reasonable and the writers are highly qualified, then you have found a winning combination.