Almost seems like the print head is brushing the paper but can 39 t understand why the same spot on the paper. If there was a clearance issue, you would think it would be right from the start. I did run some double weight matt normally uses the top feed and no marks at all. Annoyed because fine art paper is expensive and my wife likes these papers for hand tinting of b amp w. Someone claimed that the front feeder is actually for really skinny papers contrary to what the vague manual implies i tried some hahnemuhle photo rag pearl 320 with the front and it had, starting an inch in, some ink blobs and then fine scrapes going across it, and heard what sounded like head rubbing. However, unless these products are complemented by epson consumables, users cannot expect to fully capitalize on their investment.

Epson understands that printing is a process, with printer, inks and paper working together to offer the ultimate in quality output. With this in mind, epson produces consumables that offer optimum performance throughout a long, trouble free, working life. Acid free base to preserve fine art and photos 100% cotton rag for archivability highest d max of all cotton papers enhanced 1440 dpi printing for high quality output dries instantly for easy handling buffered cotton base ensures archivability resistance to water ink is dry to the touch after printing, however it takes 24 hours before it cures and becomes durable. Epson is introducing four new fine art papers: i recently had a chance to test early samples of these papers. _ all the new papers are acid free and lignin free, ph buffered fiber based papers. As one would expect from the nomenclature, the hot press papers have a very smooth surface.

In fact, they have the smoothest surface i have seen to date in a fine art paper. _ i want to make sure that the reader understands that paper choices are a highly personal matter. There are many intangibles such as ldquo the look rdquo of certain colors or of black and white images, the tactile feel, the type of surface, the style of the work that is going to be shown on that paper, the subject matter, and so on. There are also issues of how the images are going to be displayed: framed? unframed? under glass or plexiglass? with or without uv filtering? i therefore urge the readers to make their own choices based on personal preferences. I may love a paper that someone else dislikes, and vice versa, i may really like a paper that someone else hates.

Keeping the above in mind, i will now proceed and give you my personal biased opinion on the new epson papers. _ one of the first impressions with all these papers is that they are sharper than their predecessors. I can actually see the difference in sharpness printing at 1440 versus 2880 dpi using an epson 9900. Another first impression is that the color gamut of these papers is quite a bit wider than their predecessors more on this later in this report .

Printable Narrative Writing Paper

The massive brightness combined with the heavy texture detracts from the image, something that i find quite disturbing. This version of the cold press papers solves to some extent the multiple personality disorder. Unfortunately, even though the paper is mould made, it looks and feels like a a machine made paper. To me, it feels artificial, like the paper was not born to be like this and a vise grip was applied to force the texture. To be perfectly honest, i was predisposed to like the natural white better, because i typically do not like brighteners, but in this case i ended up preferring the bright white by a slight margin.

Article Review on Human Resource Management

The only exception is in portraiture, where the highlights can be a bit too aggressive with this paper. Overall and for everything else, i prefer the bright white, as long as the intent is to display the prints without uv protection more on this later in this report. The color gamut of this paper and the other 3 new papers is outstanding for a matte fine art paper.

I was actually quite surprised by the purity and brilliance of the yellows and the blues, which actually exceed the baryta photo black papers. The screen shot below shows a comparison of the color gamut of my favorite baryta paper, ilford gold fibre silk white frame versus the new epson hot press bright using an epson 9900 printer. Note how even though the gamut of the epson paper is smaller, it actually exceeds the gamut of gold fiber silk in the yellows and the blues. The reds of this paper are slightly better than smooth matte papers of the past, but still quite weak compared to the baryta papers. Whomever makes this paper i assume epson buys it from someone else has achieved a very good balance of tone, gamut and contrast, with an absolutely gorgeous surface and beautiful tactile feel. The big unknown, is how long the brighteners will last and whether the paper will end up looking like the natural white years from now.

Junior Cert Essay on Christopher Columbus

Epson claims that the brighteners will fade over time no life span given and the paper will end up looking like the natural version. Unfortunately, in spite of similar claims by paper manufacturers in the past, papers with brighteners have almost always looked much worse than papers without brighteners after a relatively short period of time. While epson may be absolutely correct in their claim, each individual will have to decide whether they wish to take this risk with their prints.

hot press natural white ndash

all the beauty of the bright white version, but with slightly worse color rendition. For prints that are under uv protection, or prints where longevity is important, i would not take the risk of brighteners and would use this paper instead of the bright. For portraits, no question this is the better paper skin tones are slightly more natural and highlights have just the right amount of punch without getting too aggressive.

Many people seem to do a very silly thing: they choose a paper with brighteners and then put it under uv protection. They forget that optical brighteners are activated by uv light, so framing an image under glass or plexiglass with a uv filter, or spraying a print with a spray that has uv protection, totally negates the effect of the brighteners. In other words, the print will look the same as if it was printed on the natural version of the paper.