College athletes should be paid there has been major discussion recently concerning the topic if college athletes should or shouldn't be paid while they are attending school. The first thing the opposition wants to say is, they're already getting a scholarship! isn’t that's more than anybody else? don't be greedy! contrary to what the opposition states, being a college athlete is a full time job. A typical day for a college athlete is a player must wake up before classes begin to lift or condition around five a.m.

Ibm Research Master Thesis

For the most part, the athlete must attend a mandatory study hall where the athlete can get extra help with their homework or study for an upcoming test. The scholarships that athlete receives only covers the cost of credit hours, living facility, and food which gets old really quick. According to steve wulf, many college athletes come from disadvantage backgrounds, and scholarship money only covers the bare minimum. While athletes work their rear ends off, the university makes millions and the coach’s gets a six figure yearly salary. Although people argue college athletes already have a scholarship, these athletes have no choice but to go the extra mile by maintaining high grades and performing at a high level in their sports so they should be compensated for it.

Opposition

essay, research paper: college athletes support

free sport research papers were donated by our members/visitors and are presented free of charge for informational use only. The essay or term paper you are seeing on this page was not produced by our company and should not be considered a sample of our research/writing service. We are neither affiliated with the author of this essay nor responsible for its content. If you need high quality, fresh and competent research / writing done on the subject of sport, use the professional writing service offered by our company. With millions of dollars in merchandising and television contracts at stake, colleges have a lot of money riding on the recruitment, education, and performanceboth on and off the field of college athletes. Colleges lure the athletes to their school, and make sure they meet the eligibility requirements when there. In order for athletes to be eligible to play in college they must attain a minimum of a 2.0 gpa in 11 designated courses, and earn a combined 700 on the sats.

With so much at stake, some colleges often go too far, by providing players with personal tutors, who often do work for the players, and pressuring teachers and administrators to look the other way when athletes fail. The ncaa also bars players from receiving any compensation, except scholarships for their play. However, there are many incidences of players receiving other sorts of compensation. There are many violations of athletic department officials and trustees giving players money, or gifts, ranging from clothing to cars. Colleges have also been known to give gifts to players just to get them to attend their institution, a practice that is much harder to trace because the student is not enrolled at the school. This has an effect on the psyche of the athletes more incidences of sexual abuse and other crimes by athletes are arising every year. Even though the ncaa strictly prohibits all of these things from going on, it seems every year another school is violating them.

These rules are not stringent enough both academically and socially for the players. The last major change to these rules came in 1989 with the passage of proposition 42. The 1983 proposition, known as proposition 42, required that, beginning in 1986, all athletes must earn a minimum of a 2.0 in eleven designated high school courses, and earn a minimum score of 700 on their sats. If they did not earn these minimums players could still enroll in the university, under full scholarship, not play or practice with the team, but earn their minimum gpa and then play the next year without ever having met the initial requirements. In an article written for the new republic in may 1986, malcolm gladwell criticizes proposition 48 and the effects it will have on college sports.

He identifies the main problem with proposition 48, citing berkeley sociologist harry edwards, the big universities will simply keep a separate roster of first year ineligible athletes along with their regular players 16. The amount of money a school has will determine how many non qualifying players they can lure to their schools with scholarships. This is the reason for the passing of proposition 42, which bars colleges from giving scholarships to incoming freshmen that do not meet the requirements. Consequently, many people feel that these tougher regulations will lead to more cheating. If that is the case, than more severe punishments should be installed to deter this behavior.

A side effect of proposition 48 is that, many of the athletes that attend these schools on basketball and football scholarships are from low income families that cannot afford to pay tuition to large universities. It is these people that will lose out if the colleges cannot find another way of paying for them. This in effect will lead to more cheating, like colleges helping prospective students secure government grants and loans, but this is not always enough. They may have to have trustees pay for some of their education, or may be outright given money by the schools. What about the athletes that do meet them, what are they given? the top athletes in the country know they can get scholarships from many schools, so what else are these top schools willing to give them? at the least, these athletes receive preferential treatment. With so many of the countries top basketball and football players, some with criminal records, coming from lower class communities, where does this preferential treatment stop? there are many cases of college athletes violating the law and someone looking the other way.

There has never been a better example of widespread athletics corruption than the university of minnesota. The scandals at the university of minnesota are so important because they were not isolated incidents, but rather operations that had gone on for years before being uncovered. After the 1986 scandal when three basketball players were accused of rape, the team was accused of over forty violations and put on probation merely put on probation for forty rules violations? then, in 1989, luther darville, acting coordinator of the schools office of minority affairs was uncovered as having given money to players. According to steve wulf, a staff writer for sports illustrated, darville is alleged to have siphoned money from the minority affairs office from 1983 to 88 and to have doled some of it out to 17 students, including nine athletes, in need of cash 13.

Do All Essays Need a Thesis

This shows the dedication some large schools have to keeping their athletes satisfied. The article goes on to state that, according to valdez baylor, a former tailback on the gopher football team, go see luther was the catchphrase among minority athletes in need. Baylors account leads me to believe that darvilles activities were much more widespread than 17 students.

In the chronicle of higher education, welch suggs provides an account of the next chapter in the declination of the university of minnesota. A secretary in the departments academic services office, completed more than 100 class assignments for as many as 20 basketball players during a five year period a41. The article goes on to state the school may have stepped in on the reports of two dozen sexual misconduct cases, against tutors and other women on campus, in order to protect the athletes involved. Many colleges cater to these students, giving them money, clothing, and other material possessions. Athletic departments are primarily self funded, so if they dont have winning teams, they dont make any money.

College Essay Writing Company

Consequently, the more the teams win the more money the schools and athletic departments make. Therefore, schools and coaches are willing to take a risk on athletes that have a background of bad behavior, if that person will make a difference on the field. Athletes that attend these big universities expect the universities to do everything for them, and they are more than often correct.